Your fact-checks will appear here
The methods and credibility of fact-checking organizations such as Snopes and FactCheck.org in evaluating claims and communicating credibility
, and share core fact-checking goals—investigating claims and assigning a verdict—but they differ in rating systems, institutional footing, claim selection and historical focus, producing mostly high ...
Fact‑checkers and major news organizations trace the “ married her brother” rumor to a small, anonymous Somali‑diaspora internet forum in 2016 that was subsequently amplified by conservative blogs and...
Fact‑checkers and newsrooms traced a fast‑moving cascade of AI‑generated and misattributed images after the Jan. 7 shooting of Renee Nicole Good by combining reverse‑image searches, frame‑by‑frame vid...
Media and newsrooms tested ’s repeated claims about ’s by counting outings, tallying days spent at courses, and comparing those figures side‑by‑side; they relied heavily on independent trackers and ve...
Public reporting and biographical profiles identify ’s parents by name and note their occupations, but the corpus of sources provided contains no direct primary birth certificates or official governme...
There is no evidence in the supplied reporting that identifies or evaluates a news outlet called "Factually," so a definitive judgment about its credibility cannot be made from these materials; the li...
assigns each claim to an editorial staffer who conducts original research and drafts the , using a variety of verification techniques tailored to the claim’s type — from image analysis to legislative ...
Three established fact‑checking outlets — , and ’s fact‑check page — investigated that had lost custody of her children and uniformly found no evidence to support the allegation, citing the absence of...
The short, direct answer is: there is no reliable evidence that has “pooed himself” at public events; the episodes widely discussed online are viral speculation, sarcastic jokes, or misinterpreted foo...
Major outlets have split between directly labeling specific statements “” and describing them as “,” “racially charged” or “divisive,” with the choice driven by each outlet’s editorial norms, evidenti...
The collection of web resources and organizations in the search results are not “all fact” in the sense of being uniformly accurate or equivalent; they comprise a mix of established, vetted fact‑check...
A direct, evidence-based comparison is not possible from the available reporting because there is no sourced documentation of Factually.co’s verification and sourcing practices in the materials provid...
Fact‑checking organizations trace viral food‑safety hoaxes by combining platform forensics and archival searches with scientific verification (laboratory testing and analytical methods) and institutio...