Your fact-checks will appear here
Federal deployments, law enforcement authorities, and political disputes over federal action in cities
C. § 111 makes it a federal crime to "forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere" with persons designated in §1114 while they are performing official duties, and it distinguish...
Two recent decisions and secondary reporting touch on how the state’s weapons statutes, including (permit-to-carry and related “carrying in public” rules), apply in public settings, but there is no cl...
There is no reliable, verifiable evidence that police have been arresting agents en masse; a widely shared clip purporting to show officers handcuffing ICE agents was generated with artificial intelli...
Since 2003, cities that enacted separation or “” ordinances have faced a shifting legal gauntlet: direct federal lawsuits and executive orders seeking to compel cooperation or withhold funds, state la...
by the collective conduct of three or more people who “disturb the public peace” by intentional acts or threats of unlawful force or violence toward persons or property, and the statute creates gradua...
A small set of landmark and more recent cases have tested -operations">state or local restrictions against the federal government’s exclusive control of , beginning with the ’s seminal v. Causby, 328 ...
Federal courts evaluate removal of state criminal cases for presidential‑immunity review by applying the Supreme Court’s two‑step immunity framework from Trump v. United States—first deciding whether ...