Index/Topics/Federal Rules of Evidence

Federal Rules of Evidence

A set of rules governing the admissibility of evidence in federal courts.

Fact-Checks

10 results
Jan 26, 2026
Most Viewed

Are witness statements addmissible in court or are they hearsay?

Witness statements are not categorically inadmissible: an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of what it asserts is and generally inadmissible, but federal and state rules carve out excl...

Jan 28, 2026
Most Viewed

Have independent medical or hospital records confirming the agent’s fingertip injury been released or cited in court filings?

Based on the collection of reporting and legal guides provided for review, there is no evidence within those sources that independent medical or hospital records confirming the agent’s have been publi...

Jan 27, 2026
Most Viewed

What forensic standards and tools are considered best practice for authenticating CSAM files in court?

The accepted court-side playbook for authenticating child sexual abuse material () mirrors broader best practices: satisfy relevance, establish authenticity under 901/902, document a tamper-proof chai...

Jan 12, 2026

How did courts rule in E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits against Donald Trump, and what evidence was admitted at trial?

Federal juries and judges found in favor of E. Jean Carroll in separate lawsuits: a 2023 jury found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and defaming her, awarding $5 million, and a subseq...

Jan 19, 2026

What methods do forensic experts use to authenticate viral audio recordings?

Forensic experts authenticate viral audio by combining file-level forensics, signal-analysis techniques and contextual cross-checks to detect edits, device origins or synthetic generation . Techniques...

Feb 6, 2026

Which real-world people are implicated by the documentary and what evidence supports those links?

No specific documentary or film was provided, so it is not possible to name which real-world people a documentary implicates; the available reporting instead describes how is treated in law and what s...

Feb 1, 2026

What evidence and courtroom rulings did the Second Circuit cite when affirming Carroll’s $5 million verdict?

affirmed the $5 million verdict largely by endorsing the district court’s evidentiary choices—finding that testimony from Carroll’s friends, recordings (including the 2005 tape), and testimony from ot...

Jan 29, 2026

What rules govern defense counsel’s access to alleged CSAM evidence in federal prosecutions?

Federal rules and statutes create a tense, often case‑by‑case framework that both restricts and enables defense counsel’s access to alleged child sexual abuse material (): the constrain use of sexual‑...

Jan 18, 2026

How have courts and prosecutors handled past sexual‑misconduct claims against Donald Trump, including civil suits and criminal inquiries?

Federal and state courts have treated most sexual‑misconduct allegations against Donald Trump as civil matters, with one high‑profile jury in New York finding him liable for sexual abuse and defamatio...

Jan 8, 2026

What evidence did the juries cite in E. Jean Carroll’s trials and how did courts rule on its admissibility?

Juries in E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits relied on Carroll’s own testimony, contemporaneous and later statements, corroborating witness accounts and contextual materials — notably testimonies from two oth...