Your fact-checks will appear here
The Justice Department's protection of grand-jury materials in the Epstein files.
The Biden White House did not force the Justice Department to publish the so‑called “Epstein files” largely because DOJ officials and senior Democrats insisted on prosecutorial independence and legal ...
The judge who ruled to keep certain -related grand jury materials sealed was of the . While Engelmayer refused to release those transcripts and later said he lacked jurisdiction to appoint an independ...
The Justice Department’s recent public release of the so‑called “Epstein files” contains extensive redactions: victim names and identifying details, names and passages that appear to refer to alleged ...
Previous unverified were handled through a patchwork of criminal probes, a controversial 2008 federal non‑prosecution agreement, , targeted criminal indictments in 2019, and large-scale document revie...
The Biden White House publicly explained its refusal to order a wholesale release of Jeffrey Epstein–related files by pointing to legal and privacy constraints — principally grand‑jury secrecy, protec...
is the central statutory framework: it presumptively seals “matters occurring before the grand jury” and permits disclosure only under narrow, enumerated exceptions and a demanding “particularized nee...
Between 2021 and 2025 the sealed portions of the so‑called “” sat under the legal control of federal law‑enforcement and prosecutorial entities — principally the and the — alongside the specific attor...
The government continues to withhold portions of the special counsel’s report and other documents because judges have imposed holds and protections under criminal-procedure and national-security rules...
has repeatedly said it withheld or redacted portions of the to protect victims, preserve legally protected materials, and avoid jeopardizing ongoing investigations, citing categories such as personall...
did not broadly publish the remaining investigative records largely because many materials were subject to legal protections—, sealed court proceedings, ongoing appeals, and attorney‑client or evident...
Federal courts have treated sealed settlements and unsealed affidavits in -related litigation as competing interests between public transparency and longstanding secrecy rules: judges have ordered wid...
Courts and journalists have treated names on –era guest lists and related records as starting points for inquiry rather than proof of criminality, applying evidentiary rules, corroboration standards a...
The FOIA framework requires agencies to search for and disclose responsive records but permits broad, enumerated exemptions for sensitive material—so the process for documents like the is a mix of sta...
Yes — the federal government possessed extensive Epstein-related files during ’s presidency, but saying “” simplifies a complex reality: files were held by the and while criminal matters, grand juries...
Journalists and third parties can ask a court to by filing a formal motion in the district court that sealed the records, invoking either the First Amendment or the common-law right of access, and whe...
Federal judges have moved from a posture of routine grand-jury secrecy toward a series of orders allowing the release of a wide swath of Epstein-related materials after Congress enacted the Epstein Fi...
A mix of legal constraints, bureaucratic reality and partisan politics explains why successive administrations did not simply “release the Epstein case” in full: grand‑jury secrecy, victim‑privacy red...
The Justice Department’s slow, heavily redacted rollout of the Epstein materials reflects a collision between statutory transparency demands and established legal and privacy protections — principally...
There is no evidence in the supplied reporting that federal grand jury subpoenas, indictments, or sworn affidavits have been publicly filed that reference the individuals named in the viral "Riley" re...
Legal limits such as grand jury secrecy and victim‑privacy statutes have long restricted public access to high‑profile investigation records by design: to protect witnesses and targets, preserve inves...