Your fact-checks will appear here
The debate over whether to reform or abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), including arguments for preserving institutional capacity, pursuing legislative fixes, and the potential consequences of abolition.
Proponents of abolishing argue the agency is institutionally abusive, unnecessary in its current form, fiscally wasteful, and politically incapable of —so dismantling it is the only way to stop ongoin...
has clear legal levers to abolish an executive agency like : pass legislation rescinding the agency’s statutory authority, strip or redirect its appropriations, and reassign its functions to other ent...
The reporting supplied centers on recent , public backlash and political fallout — it does not include any statement or evidence about , the company (the sources focus on agency conduct, polls, protes...
The principal arguments for reforming Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rather than abolishing it center on preserving institutional capacity for immigration enforcement and public safety, pur...