Your fact-checks will appear here
The use of force policy by ICE and its differences from other federal agencies
Federal law permits immigration officers to carry firearms and use force as part of their statutory powers, but that authority is tightly framed by departmental policies, constitutional limits, and in...
ICE operates under the same constitutional rules limiting deadly force as other police — deadly force is lawful only to stop an imminent threat of death or serious injury — but in practice ICE’s polic...
Since 2020 ICE’s firearms training shows two simultaneous trends: a pullback from controversial civilian-facing programs that drew public backlash, and continued institutional consolidation and modern...
Public reporting establishes that 2017 saw a sharp rise in ICE use-of-force episodes — ProPublica counted “more than 170 incidents” in the first nine months of the Trump administration — but the docum...
ICE’s firearms and use-of-force policy requires mandatory reporting and multilayered administrative review for any discharge or serious force incident, beginning with agency filings and potentially mo...
ICE requires staff to document and report all use-of-force incidents, follows internal handbooks and detention standards that set timelines and review steps, and refers serious cases to the Office of ...
ICE’s formal use-of-force rules mirror broader federal guidance: deadly force is authorized only in narrow circumstances and firearms “shall not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles” unless...