Your fact-checks will appear here
Systematic reviews of after-action reports to identify systemic problems and ensure adherence to external standards and best-practice guidelines.
Major VPN providers vary widely in what they publish, how often, and how granularly: some (, , , , , and others) publish regular that enumerate legal requests and explain outcomes, while others publis...
Consumers should and warrant canaries as useful but imperfect signals: verify publication cadence, granularity, and legal context, and cross-check claims against third‑party evidence before subscribin...
No independent election‑forensics experts are identified in the provided reporting as having publicly evaluated Election Truth Alliance’s (ETA) 2024 reports; the materials instead show ETA’s own analy...
After-action reports () and judge against written activation criteria, command decisions, tactics used, , and documented outcomes; they do so through structured templates, witness interviews, risk ass...