Your fact-checks will appear here
The Supreme Court case INS v. Delgado and its implications on immigration stops and Fourth Amendment seizures.
U.S. citizens enjoy the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures when interacting with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): courts have repeatedly held those pro...
When ICE or CBP approaches on private property, individuals and employers enjoy core Fourth Amendment protections: agents may lawfully occupy and question people in publicly accessible areas of a busi...
The Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applies to ICE just as it does to other federal officers: public spaces generally carry a lower expectation of privacy so q...
Federal courts have treated INS v. Delgado as a pivot point: the Supreme Court held that workplace questioning by immigration agents was, on the facts, a “classic consensual encounter” and not a Fourt...