Can US invade Canada
A conventional U.S. invasion of Canada is technically feasible in that the U.S. military is far larger and could win many pitched battles, but it is politically, legally and practically highly unlikel...
Your fact-checks will appear here
The principles of international law regarding territorial sovereignty and the acquisition of territory by force
A conventional U.S. invasion of Canada is technically feasible in that the U.S. military is far larger and could win many pitched battles, but it is politically, legally and practically highly unlikel...
A lawful transfer of Greenland to another state would require peaceful, negotiated cession that respects Danish sovereignty and Greenlandic self-determination — not a unilateral sale or seizure — and ...
A U.S. attempt to annex or occupy Greenland would collide with established international law prohibiting acquisition of territory by force, a norm enshrined in the UN Charter and reinforced by post‑Wo...
— and in limited cases transfer — foreign sovereign assets through a mix of statutory authorities, executive orders implemented by ’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (), civil-forfeiture statutes enf...
, there is ; the recent coverage connects the Islamic State only to detainee transfers and not to territorial claims . If the user meant "US" instead of "IS," the sources show vigorous U.S. interest a...
Any lawful transfer or “sale” of Greenland would have to navigate entrenched Danish sovereignty, Greenlandic self-determination rights and a body of international law that forbids acquisition by force...
An extra‑judicial seizure of a sitting head of state or envoy — an “abduction” — would almost always violate international law and sovereign immunity norms; the Alex Saab episode shows how contentious...
President Trump’s quip — “The fact that they landed a boat there 500 years ago doesn’t mean they own the land” — compresses three separate debates into one sentence: the historical roots of human pres...