Your fact-checks will appear here
Prosecutions related to the January 6 events, including those that have named Donald J. Trump.
There is no single authoritative tally that answers “ broken”; publicly available reporting shows multiple criminal indictments, hundreds of civil and constitutional legal challenges to his actions, a...
Donald Trump entered 2026 with the legal landscape largely reshaped by election returns, court rulings, and at least one completed state prosecution: he was convicted in the New York falsifying-busine...
Allegations that Donald Trump committed "treason" are politically charged and legally specific: under the U.S. Constitution treason means either levying war against the United States or giving "aid an...
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment bars from federal or state office anyone who, having previously sworn an oath to support the Constitution as a public official, “engaged in insurrection or rebell...
’s public record is marked by a prodigious volume of false or misleading statements catalogued by multiple fact‑checking projects and researchers, a pattern observers have tied to deliberate rhetorica...
’s lawyers challenged the subpoena with a bundle of constitutional and procedural defenses—most prominently claims of presidential (or at least functional) immunity and separation-of-powers violations...
The courts initially rejected ’s sweeping claim of blanket criminal immunity for actions around , allowing federal prosecution to proceed, a ruling the unanimously affirmed before the later crafted a ...
Yes — individuals and entities can and do in both his private and official capacities, but success depends on legal doctrine (immunity and jurisdiction), timing, the nature of the alleged conduct, and...
There is no credible evidence that has a formal, operational partnership with the ; however, his rhetoric and the public endorsements and praise from white‑supremacist figures — notably and Klan‑align...
The vacated the ’s immunity ruling and remanded v. to the district court with instructions to make factbound determinations about which of the indictment’s allegations—especially those involving attem...
did not simply reject or accept "’s final immunity claims" in an all-or-nothing way; in the Court issued a 6–3 opinion that carved out robust constitutional immunities for former presidents with respe...
Court filings in the prosecutions repeatedly point to a handful of striking passages from ’s Ellipse speech: prosecutors and many defendants cited his off-script admonition “We’re going to walk down t...
The best public record shows a persistent pattern of and multiple lines of evidence that at least some of those falsehoods were intentional: scholarly analyses of his communications found “significant...
Mainstream fact‑checking organizations documented Donald Trump’s false historical claims through large-scale databases, systematic rating systems and thematic tallies that treated repetitions, narrati...
The Supreme Court in Trump v. United States established a three‑tiered immunity framework — absolute for core constitutional acts, presumptive for other official acts within the “outer perimeter,” and...
Public reporting shows a shifting patchwork of criminal and civil matters that have at times named Donald J. Trump personally and his businesses, but reporters and litigation trackers stress that many...