Your fact-checks will appear here
The 1827 Supreme Court decision in Martin v. Mott, which established the President's discretion over domestic troop deployments.
Federal courts have long treated presidential invocations of the Insurrection Act as presumptively political and thus often nonjusticiable, but that deference has limits: courts have intervened where ...
Since 2000 and the executive branch have not enacted a permanent expansion of presidential authority under the , but episodic amendments, proposed rewrites, and short‑lived changes have sharpened the ...
courts have historically granted presidents broad deference when they deploy military forces domestically under the , grounded in early precedent that left threshold judgments to the executive, yet ju...