Your fact-checks will appear here
The ability to critically evaluate media sources and identify bias
A wide range of compilations and watchdogs catalog and challenge outlets that publish falsehoods, from Wikipedia’s curated "List of fake news websites" to active fact‑checking organizations such as Sn...
Major media‑bias trackers such as AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and newer aggregators like Biasly routinely place a set of mainstream U.S. outlets on the left/lean‑left part of their spectrum; examples co...
Platforms and mainstream outlets use a mix of labels, algorithmic demotion, third‑party fact‑checking, editorial corrections and public clarifications to address satire that circulates as literal news...
AllSides is a widely used media-bias aggregator that publicly rates over a thousand outlets and fact-checkers using a mix of multipartisan editorial reviews and blind surveys; it positions itself as a...
The world can be steered away from widespread ignorance — but not by a single miracle fix; success depends on sustained, coordinated investments in critical thinking, media and information literacy, a...
Local corrections to social-media misreports about public religious observance in New York City generally follow three paths—verification reporting by local fact-checkers, public-office responses and ...
Fact‑checkers distinguish AI‑generated protest videos from authentic footage by combining visible visual clues (odd lighting, blurry faces, unnatural object behavior), technical markers (invisible wat...
Ad Fontes, AllSides and Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) pursue the same goal—helping readers spot political slant—but they diverge sharply on method and therefore on outcomes: Ad Fontes pairs multi-analy...