Your fact-checks will appear here
A legal test used to determine whether material is obscene, including written fiction.
A recent federal district court dismissed a possession charge tied to wholly AI‑generated obscene images, finding Section 1466A unconstitutional as applied to private possession of virtual CSAM—invoki...
Most authoritative statutes aimed at operate at the federal level and target visual depictions, while states vary and rarely criminalize purely written or fictional narratives about minors except wher...
courts and commentators show a narrow set of defenses that have had measurable success against prosecutions for : First Amendment challenges rooted in , obscenity‑test attacks under , and factual or p...
Text-only sexual writing that depicts minors is treated far more permissively under U.S. law and constitutional doctrine than visual depictions: federal statutes and precedent focus criminal liability...
A small set of headline cases and doctrinal tests have shaped whether filmed consensual fetish acts fall outside First Amendment protection, but most litigation has split along two lines: U.S. courts ...