Your fact-checks will appear here
The protection of ongoing investigations and litigation through redactions.
says it applied the redactions required by and other legal obligations — principally to , remove (CSAM) and to avoid prejudicing — while releasing a rolling tranche of documents because of the volume ...
did not "release" the Epstein files because they did not have unilateral legal custody or operational control over the records at issue; instead they pushed for full, unredacted disclosure and have pu...
Newsrooms tallied mentions of public figures by searching the ’s multi‑million‑page for names and references, then reporting raw counts with caveats about context, corroboration and redactions; the nu...
The Epstein Files Transparency Act creates two explicit, statutory carve-outs to public disclosure: records that would reveal “personally identifiable information of victims” or victims’ medical files...
The contested materials tied to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell comprise sprawling FBI and U.S. Attorney investigative files, grand‑jury materials, photos, emails, flight logs, tax and custody r...
The Justice Department has publicly said it is withholding discrete categories of Epstein‑era material — chiefly unredacted victim personal information and records that could jeopardize active investi...