Your fact-checks will appear here
The safety and efficacy of penile traction devices, including recommended usage and potential complications.
Direct clinical evidence that compares different penile constriction-ring materials and designs head‑to‑head is sparse; most available data are product reviews, professional society guidance, device‑s...
Patient adherence and prescribed wear‑time are the central determinants of real‑world effectiveness: earlier devices demanded multi‑hour daily regimens that many patients could not sustain, reducing o...
Published (PTT) studies report a clear dose–response relationship between daily traction time and anatomical improvements—meta‑analytic projections estimate curvature improves roughly 5–8° for every 3...
There are purpose‑made, sterilizable tools marketed for and a consistent body of harm‑reduction guidance (cleaning, boiling, betadine, UV, sterile lubricants, medical‑grade stainless steel) in both me...
Multi‑hour penile traction protocols historically required 3–8 hours daily and produced substantial drop‑off in real‑world use; early studies flagged prolonged wear as a core reason patients did not p...
Common myths tie penis size to sexual prowess and partner satisfaction, yet a large body of reporting and expert commentary shows size is neither a reliable predictor of pleasure nor the central drive...
Urologists and the clinical literature recommend that penile traction devices be used with controlled, low-grade tension, careful attention to circulation and skin integrity, and under clinician guida...