Your fact-checks will appear here
The Posse Comitatus Act and its relation to the Insurrection Act, including the prohibition on using the military for domestic law enforcement.
Courts have focused on tangible indicia of who exercised command and control—legal status (Title 10 vs. Title 32), orders issued, chain-of-command communications, funding and mission definitions, and ...
The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy federal armed forces and federalize National Guard units to suppress insurrections, enforce federal authority, or assist civilian authorities wh...
A U.S. governor can, under state constitutions and statutes and historical practice, proclaim martial law within his or her state when faced with insurrection, invasion, or extreme civil disorder, sub...
Since 2024, state governors and have framed “” not only as a legal shift in command but as a potential political and operational flashpoint: governors have publicly warned against unwanted transfers o...
Recent judicial decisions have pushed back against executive claims of unchecked power under the and related emergency authorities, holding that presidential invocations are reviewable and limited by ...
The core legal question is whether President Trump can lawfully invoke the Insurrection Act, withhold federal funds, or otherwise deploy federal forces in Minnesota to suppress protests linked to ICE ...
If the president explicitly invoked the Insurrection Act in 2026, federal courts would apply a mix of statutory text, historic practice, constitutional limits, and evolving standards from recent refor...
Governors have used the National Guard both to cooperate with and to resist federal immigration operations, leveraging different duty statuses, lawsuits, and public orders to shape outcomes . The resu...
courts have historically granted presidents broad deference when they deploy military forces domestically under the , grounded in early precedent that left threshold judgments to the executive, yet ju...
has not been documented in the provided reporting as using the literal phrase "we're in a Civil War," but he has repeatedly framed political conflict in explicit wartime language—most notably calling ...
Federal district courts in , and rejected or enjoined elements of and related federalizations — finding either that statutory prerequisites for military or federalized-guard action were unmet or that ...
Title 10 places National Guard members on federal active duty under presidential control and federal funding, while Title 32 keeps Guard members under state control but may be paid with federal dollar...
The Insurrection Act is the narrow statutory bridge that permits the President to federalize state National Guard units or deploy active-duty forces for domestic law‑enforcement purposes in three spec...
Local leaders can and do ask for National Guard help, but the legal pathway, who controls the troops, and when they can be used depend on whether the Guard is serving under state or federal authority,...