Your fact-checks will appear here
The legal constraints on the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement.
The Insurrection Act empowers a president to deploy federal military forces and federalize state militias to suppress insurrections, enforce federal law, and protect constitutional rights when ordinar...
The short answer: not routinely, but it is legally and politically possible under narrow circumstances — and courts, governors and the Pentagon have already been fighting over where that line sits. Go...
The President cannot unilaterally override an ordinary state governor’s control of that state’s National Guard in routine circumstances; governors command their Guards unless the federal government fe...
of their state National Guard and can call them up for state active duty under state law . The president also has statutory powers to federalize and deploy the Guard—most notably under and, in narrow ...
The Constitution contains no explicit grant of power to declare “martial law,” and that absence shapes multiple legal constraints: Congress controls domestic military deployment through statutes and a...
during domestic protests is bounded by the Fourth Amendment’s “objective reasonableness” standard and detailed department policies that permit lethal force only when an agent reasonably believes there...
Federal courts have long treated presidential invocations of the Insurrection Act as presumptively political and thus often nonjusticiable, but that deference has limits: courts have intervened where ...
The Insurrection Act’s statutory text and long-standing executive and judicial practice constrain presidential power by spelling out three discrete triggers for federal military deployment—state reque...
State governors activate their National Guard for law-enforcement support primarily by using state authorities — notably State Active Duty and Title 32 status — which keep the Guard under gubernatoria...
The Insurrection Act is a federal statute that authorizes the president to call out the U.S. military and federalize National Guard forces to suppress insurrection, enforce federal law, or protect civ...
State lawsuits challenging the federalization of have relied heavily on two legal constraints: the , which limits the use of federal military forces for domestic law enforcement absent express authori...
is legally permissible under federal statutes including Title 10 and the Armed Forces Reserve Act, and has historical precedent in crises from to . Yet when the Guard is already deployed by a governor...
Federal and appellate courts have broadly constrained recent presidential orders to federalize state National Guard units, finding legal limits on using federal Title 10 authority to put Guard troops ...
Title 32 keeps the Guard under state control while often using federal pay and authorities, whereas Title 10 federalizes forces under presidential control — a shift that changes chains of command, app...
State statutes — usually in each state’s constitution or military/government code — authorize governors, as commander-in-chief of their state’s National Guard, to call the Guard into state active duty...
Federal shape by imposing legal and agency standards—deadly force is permitted only when an agent reasonably believes there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm, and force must be pro...
Federal courts in the 20th century rarely enjoined presidential uses of the Insurrection Act, which was instead used to enforce federal desegregation orders and to quell major riots (e.g., Eisenhower ...
When National Guard units operate in Title 32 “hybrid” status, the prevailing legal interpretation is that they remain under state control and therefore are not subject to the Posse Comitatus Act’s ba...
The Supreme Court’s recent interventions have constrained the president’s Article II claim to deploy military forces domestically, signaling that such deployments are “exceptional,” subject to statuto...
The Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) restricts the federal military from acting as domestic law enforcement by forbidding use of the Army, Air Force and (by amendment or policy) other armed services to “exec...