How have the courts ruled in Ice tactics
The federal courts have delivered a patchwork of rulings on ICE tactics: recent Supreme Court orders have allowed certain aggressive immigration stops to resume, while lower courts and consent decrees...
Your fact-checks will appear here
The issue of racial profiling in ICE stops, with critics arguing that the Supreme Court's ruling allows for stops that target people based on their race, language, or occupation.
The federal courts have delivered a patchwork of rulings on ICE tactics: recent Supreme Court orders have allowed certain aggressive immigration stops to resume, while lower courts and consent decrees...
The Supreme Court’s September 2025 order put on hold a federal judge’s temporary restraining order that had limited Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) “roving” stops in Los Angeles, effectively...
Federal courts have drawn a line between routine policing rules and immigration enforcement: judges repeatedly say ICE can detain and arrest people suspected of being unlawfully present but must still...
Avenues exist to challenge ICE stops that hinge on race, ethnicity, language, or accent, but recent court developments and administrative realities have narrowed options and increased urgency for rapi...
Since 2015, local reporting has documented a small number of criminal cases and convictions directly involving ICE employees, most prominently a federal conviction and sentencing in Ohio, while broade...