Your fact-checks will appear here
Research on the association between receptive anal intercourse and higher rates of fecal incontinence, including risk factors and prevention strategies.
Repeated anal stretching carries a spectrum of documented risks—from temporary soreness and fissures to measurable muscle injury and, in some clinical contexts, increased risk of fecal incontinence—ye...
There are surprisingly few true longitudinal studies that track anorectal structure and function over years of frequent receptive anal intercourse (RAI); the literature is dominated by cross‑sectional...
A systematic read of the supplied reporting finds no true longitudinal cohort studies that directly link lifetime frequency of receptive anal intercourse (RAI) to later-life fecal incontinence (FI); t...
A small but consistent body of clinical case reports and physiological studies establishes biological plausibility that receptive anal intercourse (RAI) can injure the anal sphincter, yet population-l...
There are no long-term, prospective studies that specifically quantify anal incontinence rates among people who frequently use anal toys; the peer-reviewed literature instead measures associations bet...
Population studies and large surveys consistently find higher reported rates of fecal incontinence (FI) among people who report receptive anal intercourse compared with those who do not, but the effec...
No high‑quality longitudinal studies specifically tracking anal sphincter pressures over time in people who practice receptive anal intercourse (RAI) were identified in the available reporting; the mo...