Your fact-checks will appear here
The 2019 US Supreme Court decision that removed federal courts as a remedy for partisan gerrymanders.
Since 2000, rulings that reshaped redistricting most profoundly are v. Holder (which neutered Section 5 preclearance and freed Texas from prior federal oversight), (which removed federal judicial revi...
Across history both parties have drawn maps to their advantage, but in the modern era—especially after the redistricting cycle— secured the most consistent statewide and congressional seat advantages ...
Yes — the congressional map has been and can be challenged in court on constitutional grounds, principally as an unlawful racial gerrymander; federal judges have already found challengers likely to pr...
Federal courts have been largely removed from policing partisan gerrymanders since the Supreme Court’s 2019 ruling in Rucho, so the post‑2020 fight has migrated to state courts and state constitutions...