Your fact-checks will appear here
Regulation and safety of dietary supplements
There is no record in the supplied reporting that the Federal Trade Commission or the Food and Drug Administration have taken formal enforcement action specifically against Gundry MD or its supplement...
Consumers seeking to verify whether a dietary supplement marketed for blood‑sugar control actually works should treat marketing claims skeptically and demand randomized controlled trial (RCT)–level ev...
There is no reliable, independently verified evidence in the provided reporting that GlycoPezil measurably reduces hemoglobin A1C; the product’s official sites make broad blood‑sugar and “reversal” cl...
There are no direct, peer-reviewed clinical trials of a product explicitly named “Neurodefender” presented in the provided reporting; instead, the available material documents marketing claims and ing...
Available reporting shows there are no independent, peer‑reviewed clinical trials that test the GaraHerb product as a complete formula , though the brand cites peer‑reviewed studies for several indivi...
Clinical evidence for popular semen‑volume supplements such as Semenax is limited and mixed: manufacturers point to one or a few company‑sponsored randomized, double‑blind placebo‑controlled trials sh...
Consumers evaluating neuropathy supplements should prioritize independent, third‑party testing and facility audits (not marketing claims) because clinical evidence for many nutraceuticals is limited a...
Independent testing and government reviews have repeatedly found that several memory‑supplement products do not contain the ingredients or dosages their labels claim, in some cases are adulterated or ...
The query “Glyco pizel” appears to point to an internet-sold supplement marketed as -claim">Glycopezil (or similar spellings), not to the prescription diabetes drug glipizide; the marketed product mak...
Scattered but persuasive documentation shows that dishonest marketers have repeatedly used the names, images or implied endorsements of well‑known medical commentators to hawk weight‑loss products, an...
Sugar Clean, as marketed online, carries multiple credibility problems: independent watchdogs and scam-analysis sites flag deceptive marketing, fake endorsements, and opaque company details, while the...
Consumers can confirm third‑party testing and manufacturer legitimacy by looking for recognized certification marks, checking independent databases or batch reports, and understanding what different p...
Hero Up is marketed as a natural male-wellness supplement that promises gains in stamina, libido, energy and long-term vitality, a claim repeated across product pages and review sites . Available repo...
Two realities exist under the Lipomax/LipoMax name: multiple different products and multiple ingredient lists. Official vendor pages and marketplaces advertise formulas containing ingredients such as ...
Media figures have been tied to promotion of brain‑health supplements both through explicit endorsements and via their audiences being targeted by marketers, but the evidence shows a patchwork of real...
Fraudulent supplement ad campaigns routinely manufacture credibility by fabricating celebrity endorsements, fake news/magazine sites, sham expert quotes and phony consumer testimonials to push unprove...
A targeted review of the provided reporting finds no peer‑reviewed clinical trials directly testing Neurocept as a branded product or its specific blended formulation; mainstream coverage and company‑...
Subscription and fulfillment complaints—like surprise auto-renews, persistent billing, delayed or missing orders, and fulfillment of counterfeit or unsafe supplements—sharply limit straightforward con...
The manufacturer of GlucoPure does not appear to be BBB accredited and is associated with negative consumer signals: users report refund and customer-service problems, doubts about effectiveness, and ...