Your fact-checks will appear here
The potential safety concerns associated with certain ingredients in supplements, including interactions with medications and side effects.
No reporting in the provided sources shows verified, paid endorsements or formal partnerships between CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta and supplement companies; the material instead do...
The phrase “Sugar Harmonh” appears to refer to a family of consumer products marketed to support healthy blood sugar—most commonly branded as “Blood Sugar Harmony” (herbal capsules sold at multiple re...
Consumers shopping for diet supplements online navigate a marketplace regulated more like food than medicine, where federal agencies can warn, recall, and police advertising but generally do not preap...
A reliable verification strategy combines platform scrutiny, product-level evidence (third‑party testing and seals), and commonsense fraud checks; because U.S. regulators do not pre‑approve supplement...
BurnPeak’s publicly advertised formula centers on exogenous ketone BHB (beta‑hydroxybutyrate) salts and a mix of plant extracts; independent reviewers and consumer watchdogs flag the real harms most c...
LipoVive’s publicly available coverage frames it as a natural, GLP‑1–supporting supplement with a generally mild side‑effect profile reported by users, chiefly transient digestive upsets and occasiona...
Consumers can verify supplement research and manufacturing claims by looking for independent third‑party verification (NSF, USP, UL, Informed Choice), confirming cGMP compliance and facility audits, a...
Brain Defender’s ingredient roster includes several compounds with peer-reviewed evidence—most notably Ginkgo biloba and Bacopa monnieri—that have been associated with modest cognitive benefits in som...
Experts approach TV‑advertised tinnitus remedies by separating promotional claims from peer‑reviewed evidence: most widely promoted supplements and homeopathic products lack convincing efficacy data a...
Consumers can improve confidence in Trustpilot reviews for supplement brands by triangulating signals: check whether reviews are “verified” (which can mean the company invited them), look for independ...
Memory Blast, like other dietary supplements, sits in a regulatory gray zone where federal rules set manufacturing baselines but pre‑market safety and efficacy review are not required; therefore indep...
No reputable independent laboratory tests or major consumer‑reports evaluations of “Apex Force” tied to Dr. Mehmet Oz appear in the supplied reporting; available evidence consists mainly of small-scal...
Lifestyle changes and FDA‑approved erectile dysfunction (ED) medications are, on balance, more reliably effective and safer than the panoply of “natural” or TV‑promoted alternatives; FDA‑approved PDE5...
Consumers can reduce risk by favoring products that have been independently tested and certified, buying from reputable outlets, checking manufacturer transparency and labeling, and consulting health ...
Lipoless is a market-name weight-loss supplement with plant-derived stimulant and herbal extracts but no peer‑reviewed clinical trials supporting its effectiveness as a standalone approach to fat loss...
Dynamic Brain is not a clear-cut "scam"—it’s a commercially sold nootropic from Stonehenge Health with real users, manufacturing claims, and an ingredient list that includes compounds shown in some st...
Randomized clinical trials specifically reporting side effects and incidence rates for the supplement branded as “Lipovive” are not present in the reporting provided; instead, available documents are ...
GaraHerb presents itself as a “natural” male-performance supplement and its makers publicly claim the product is “non‑GMO and safe” , but independent signals on safety and legitimacy are mixed: review...
User reviews and coverage paint a consistent picture: most consumers report only mild, short-lived side effects such as digestive upset, headaches, nausea, restlessness or mood changes, while some rev...