Your fact-checks will appear here
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on penis size, including a 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical studies measure adult penis size using a small set of standard metrics—flaccid, stretched (also called stretched flaccid), and erect lengths plus circumference (girth)—with clinician-performe...
A penile length of (≈19.05 cm) combined with a girth (circumference) of 6.25 inches (≈15.88 cm) sits far to the right of the central tendency reported in , and available population studies do not prov...
An erect penis of 8 inches in length with a 6.5‑inch girth is well outside the central ranges reported by large clinical studies and, by rough statistical extrapolation, lies far beyond the 95th perce...
A penile girth (circumference) of (≈17.2 cm) sits far above the central tendency reported in and appears at the extreme tail of published distributions; the largest specific girth noted in a compiled ...
Self-reported are consistently less accurate than measurements taken by trained researchers, with multiple studies and reviews finding systematic over-reporting in self-reports and lower averages in m...
Three methodological biases—self‑measurement (including social desirability), clinical arousal method, and population selection (volunteer and geographic sampling)—drive most of the variation and skew...
Reported cross‑national differences in average are shaped as much by who measures and how as by biology: large meta‑analyses find smaller, more uniform global averages than pop culture implies, but co...