Your fact-checks will appear here
The Goldwater Rule and its implications for public psychiatric warnings, as discussed by Bandy X. Lee
A broad set of clinicians, commentators and analysts have identified recurring patterns in ’s public behavior that map onto —grandiosity, entitlement, need for admiration—and to antisocial and paranoi...
The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump is a 2017 edited volume in which 27 psychiatrists, psychologists and other mental‑health professionals assert that President Donald Trump’s observed behavior poses a...
The Goldwater Rule is an ethical constraint that discourages psychiatrists and, in practice, many psychologists from offering professional diagnoses of living public figures they have not personally e...
The —adopted by the in 1973 after psychiatrists publicly labeled “unfit” during the 1964 campaign—prohibits psychiatrists from offering a professional opinion about public figures they have not person...
A formal psychiatric evaluation tied to the 25th Amendment would not be governed by a single statute or clinical standard written into the Constitution; Section 4 assigns decision-making power to the ...
raise concentrated ethical concerns: they violate professional codes like ’s , risk factual error from incomplete information, and can erode . Defenders argue a "duty to warn" can justify public comme...
Psychologists and commentators point to repeated patterns in ’s behavior—grandiosity, callousness toward out-groups, manipulative tactics and impulsivity—as evidence that he displays traits associated...
There are clear, documented counterarguments to psychiatric critiques of ’s mental health: critics point to professional ethics that bar armchair diagnoses, the limits of public evidence versus clinic...
A number of mental‑health professionals, groups and books have publicly analyzed and judged ’s psychology and cognition, but the literature consists mainly of invited panels, opinion collections, peti...
The blunt claim "Trump is dead in the head" is a rhetorically charged, non‑clinical insult that reporting does not support as a verified medical diagnosis; however, a sustained pattern of public gaffe...
The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump prompted a polarized response: many mainstream outlets and some reviewers hailed it as an urgent public-health-style warning that reopened debate about psychiatrists...
Mental-health professionals and commentators marshaled a cluster of psychological and psychiatric arguments to claim Donald Trump was unfit for office: personality-pathology-based diagnoses (notably n...