Your fact-checks will appear here
The effectiveness of Tor in providing anonymity and common mistakes that can lead to deanonymization
Using a private search engine like Brave Search or Startpage removes or limits search-provider logging and personalization, but does not by itself hide the network source of queries; adding a VPN mask...
DuckDuckGo protects search privacy by not logging or tracking queries, but it does not, on its own, prevent an internet service provider (ISP) from seeing which sites or services a device connects to ...
the bar for online anonymity, but most real-world stem not from a mystical network failure but from user mistakes and metadata leakage: leaking identifying data in-browser or through payments, running...
visiting .onion sites by routing traffic through a distributed, volunteer-run network that layers encryption and separates knowledge of who is communicating from what service is being accessed, so nei...
by making user traffic appear to originate from a Tor exit node rather than the user's IP address, but that guarantee is conditional: —ranging from browser and plugin behavior to server misconfigurati...
, Browser and privacy-focused occupy three distinct technical positions on the privacy spectrum: DuckDuckGo is primarily a search engine and privacy-minded browser that blocks trackers and avoids stor...
Yes — under realistic threat models an ISP can sometimes infer which websites a user visits over by analyzing traffic patterns and timing, but success requires either powerful observation (seeing both...
Tor is a powerful anonymity tool but not a magic bullet; layering additional tools and disciplined practices — selectively using trusted VPNs, Tor bridges and pluggable transports, end-to-end encrypti...
Complete, 100% anonymity on the internet is effectively unattainable in practice: technical safeguards can dramatically reduce identifiability, but inevitable data trails, metadata, device identifiers...