Your fact-checks will appear here
The investigation into the relationship between Donald Trump and Epstein, with the release of documents and the scrutiny of Trump's mentions in the records.
did not fully publish the government’s during his first presidential term largely because of a mix of legal caution, bureaucratic and logistical constraints, and political calculation — not because of...
files do not constitute a legal or factual exoneration of ; they are a vast, mixed archive that contains hundreds of references to him, many unverified tips, contemporaneous news clippings and redacte...
’s massive release contains thousands of items that name or reference , but the specific materials that directly reference him are largely: news clippings and images preserved in Epstein’s files inclu...
The newly released -related and records include thousands of items that reference — ranging from emailed gossip and photos to a concentrated FBI spreadsheet cataloguing tips made to the agency’s Natio...
files contains hundreds of references to and dozens of unverified tips, but officials say the material does not include evidence that would prompt new criminal charges — a reality that makes near‑term...
The newly released documents include a small number of contemporaneous, non‑anonymous eyewitness records that reference : chiefly handwritten interview notes from a 2019 victim interview, a recollecti...
’s name appears repeatedly in the newly released document trove — ranging in the coverage from news clippings and emails to anonymous tips, flight‑record references, photos and interview notes — but t...
The newly released files mention hundreds to thousands of times across millions of pages, but the bulk of those references are media clippings, emails and third‑party tips rather than police reports d...
The public record shows that federal investigators served subpoenas seeking employment records from Donald Trump’s Mar‑a‑Lago property in connection with the Maxwell/Epstein probes, but there is no pu...