Your fact-checks will appear here
The impact of the Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's ongoing federal and state prosecutions
’s publicly released final report asserted that the admissible evidence in his dismissed federal cases against was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial, but that because policy prohi...
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment bars from federal or state office anyone who, having previously sworn an oath to support the Constitution as a public official, “engaged in insurrection or rebell...
Donald Trump’s judicial appointments substantially increased the share of Republican-appointed judges on the federal bench—most markedly on the courts of appeals—while producing only more modest shift...
Two Supreme Court decisions anchored the legal landscape over ’s private papers and the shield he sought as president: (the Court’s 2020 decision upholding a state grand-jury subpoena for his financia...
Courts have long treated as a core legislative tool and generally decline to quash them when tied to a legitimate legislative purpose, but recent doctrine has carved out special scrutiny where subpoen...
The Supreme Court in Trump v. United States established a three‑tiered immunity framework — absolute for core constitutional acts, presumptive for other official acts within the “outer perimeter,” and...