Your fact-checks will appear here
President Trump's arguments for presidential immunity in relation to his conviction, citing the Supreme Court's 2024 decision
The ’s decision in v. did not shatter a defense — it created one: the Court found that former presidents enjoy at least presumptive immunity for “official acts” and absolute immunity for a narrower co...
in v. held in a 6–3 decision that presidents enjoy absolute immunity for a "core" of official acts and at least presumptive immunity for other official acts, while denying immunity for purely unoffici...
The ’s decision in v. was not a unanimous ruling that “presidential immunity and executive privilege are accountable”; instead the Court issued a divided 6–3 opinion that carved out absolute immunity ...
The Supreme Court’s current doctrine holds that a president (including a former president) enjoys absolute criminal immunity for exercises of “core” or “conclusive and preclusive” presidential powers ...
did not hand down a new decision on presidential immunity in 2026; the landmark ruling resolving ’s immunity claims came on July 1, 2024, when a 6–3 majority issued an opinion recognizing significant ...
The ’s 6–3 decision in v. established a new constitutional framework granting former presidents absolute immunity for a narrow set of “core” presidential functions, presumptive immunity for a broader ...
No — the reporting provided does not show the on January 23 issuing an order that “rejected” a lower court’s denial of ’s in three criminal cases; instead, the key Supreme Court action on presidential...
The record shows a wave of departures among -aligned lawyers and hand-picked U.S. attorneys after a string of adverse court rulings that undercut the administration’s tactics for keeping loyalists in ...
A collision between a state-level conviction and claims of would trigger immediate legal fights over whether the challenged conduct was an “official act” and therefore immune, a question recently fram...
The Supreme Court’s July 1, 2024 immunity decision forced Special Counsel Jack Smith’s D.C. January 6 prosecution to shift from a straight-to-trial posture into a drawn-out, litigation-first strategy ...
’s decision in v. did not “reverse” into nonexistence; rather it upended lower-court rulings that denied broad immunities and instead established a new framework granting presidents absolute immunity ...
The ’s 2024 decision in v. held that presidents enjoy absolute criminal immunity for acts that fall within their “core” or exclusive constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts...
The did not rule against 's immunity claim; instead, in a divided decision the Court recognized substantial protections for former presidents from criminal prosecution for "official acts," including f...
is a contested legal doctrine that shields some presidential actions from civil or criminal liability, but its scope is now defined by a recent ruling that creates a three-tier framework distinguishin...
’s July 1, 2024 decision established a three-tier immunity framework—absolute immunity for a president’s core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for u...
in v. set a three-part framework: for acts within a president’s core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for acts within the “outer perimeter” of official responsibility, and no immunity for “...
battles—centered on congressional subpoenas and a New York grand‑jury subpoena—decided whether investigators could obtain ’s tax returns; the high court in 2020 narrowed but did not bar congressional ...
The ’s July 1, 2024 decision in v. did not simply “reject” or fully endorse former President Trump’s broad immunity theory; the Court issued a divided 6–3 opinion carving out substantial immunity for ...
did not reject ’s immunity claims in full; instead the Court in a 6–3 decision recognized broad immunity for official presidential acts, overturned a lower-court ruling that had denied immunity, and s...
Two Supreme Court decisions anchored the legal landscape over ’s private papers and the shield he sought as president: (the Court’s 2020 decision upholding a state grand-jury subpoena for his financia...