Your fact-checks will appear here
Comparisons between Donald Trump's rhetoric and historical strongmen like Mussolini, Hitler, or contemporary authoritarians like Vladimir Putin, focusing on similarities and differences in tactics and institutional outcomes.
The claim that ’s administration is ’s rise to power requires parsing rhetoric, tactics, structural moves, and ideology—a comparison many commentators and scholars make in part but also dispute in imp...
Several scholars and commentators argue that equating Trump-era U.S. politics with 1930s Germany overstates the historical parallel: critics emphasize key structural, social, and ideological differenc...
Historians, political scientists and journalists have repeatedly placed in conversation with a range of controversial leaders—invoking labels from “” to comparisons with historical s and modern strong...
is criticized for , packing his administrations with ethically troubled figures and apparent conflicts of interest, and pursuing policies that allies say protect n sovereignty while critics say weaken...
Yes — Trump's public comparisons to historical dictators and his willingness to flirt with authoritarian language can reasonably be read as a form of dog‑whistling to segments of his base: scholars an...