Your fact-checks will appear here
A landmark Supreme Court case that established the principle that presidents are not categorically immune from judicial or prosecutorial process.
of on the ground that Special Counsel was not validly appointed under the Constitution’s , a ruling that treated long‑standing lower‑court and reasoning as non‑binding or inapplicable to the facts her...
When a sitting the president oversees, it creates acute legal and ethical tensions: potential conflicts of interest in the executive branch’s control of litigation, questions about immunity and separa...
against presidents or former presidents rests on two tracks: criminal contempt referral to the and civil enforcement through the federal courts, with a rare and practically unused third option of "inh...
is a contested legal doctrine that shields some presidential actions from civil or criminal liability, but its scope is now defined by a recent ruling that creates a three-tier framework distinguishin...
Lower courts have, so far, approached the ’s new cautiously and piecemeal, largely because the Court itself remanded fact‑specific questions back to trial judges rather than announcing bright‑line rul...