Your fact-checks will appear here
The structural overlap between criminal incarceration and immigration detention in the United States.
The short answer is: not in the narrow, historical sense of , but many scholars, historians, advocates, and some detainees argue that runs large-scale, state-sanctioned systems of mass detention that ...
There is no sweeping federal "" law currently enacted; historically and legally, "amnesty" or clemency in immigration means a pardon or statutory path from unlawful status to lawful permanent residenc...
When forcibly enters a private home without a judicial warrant, have repeatedly treated those entries as potential violations and granted a mix of remedies: declaratory rulings that the entry was unco...
The One and the reinstatement of Migrant Protection Protocols (“”) sharply constricted legal routes for people seeking asylum, canceling previously scheduled appointments and driving many to wait in M...
under 8 U.S.C. §1325 is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail (and fines) for a first offense, while illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. §1326 is a felony with statutory maximums that range ...
and separate detainees in their public detention tables into three basic ity categories—those with , those with pending criminal charges, and those with no known criminal convictions or charges—while ...
Unauthorized entry and unlawful presence are governed by two different tracks of U.S. law: unlawful presence is principally a civil immigration violation that risks removal and re-entry bars, while ce...