Your fact-checks will appear here
The use of military force by the US to take control of Greenland
— has never been a U.S. possession or part of the , though has repeatedly sought to control or influence the island through wartime defense arrangements, base rights and several purchase proposals tha...
The short answer: no — the 1951 U.S.–Denmark defense agreement gives Washington sweeping operational rights in Greenland but does not lawlessly permit the United States to “set up whatever military pr...
No credible reporting in the provided sources links to a specific crime labeled “ wire fraud”; contemporary coverage documents his public campaign to secure access or influence over Greenland and alle...
The prospect of a successful U.S. seizure or outright annexation of Greenland under President Trump is legally and politically implausible but not impossible as a short-term coercive gambit: the admin...
The shorthand claim that “75% of Americans oppose the U.S. attempting to take control of Greenland” is broadly true when the question explicitly concerns using military force — multiple polls show rou...
is strategically valuable to defense because of its location astride the Greenland–– (GIUK) Gap, existing U.S. installations that support missile warning and space surveillance, and growing from and ,...