Your fact-checks will appear here
U.S. actions and policy towards the International Criminal Court
An international court would need credible, corroborated evidence that president committed or commanded conduct that falls squarely within the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction (, , , or ) and that ...
The question of whether Donald Trump has been given impunity for breaking international law has no simple yes-or-no answer: U.S. institutions and courts have afforded him significant domestic legal pr...
Federal and state courts have repeatedly acted as gatekeepers that limit or invalidate state laws singling out “Sharia” or broadly banning foreign law, grounding decisions in the Constitution’s Suprem...
custody of foreign sovereign assets after seizure is governed by a mix of federal statutes (notably provisions and extradition/MLAT authorities), procedures that channel international coordination thr...
The United States cannot, by domestic law alone, categorically nullify the International Criminal Court’s authority to investigate alleged war crimes by U.S. citizens when those crimes fall within the...