Your fact-checks will appear here
The protection of user personal information and privacy
’s public policies and legal guides make clear the company does disclose device and IP-related information to when served with valid legal process or in narrow emergency situations, and legal commenta...
Snapchat’s official documentation and multiple user guides describe My Eyes Only as a passcode‑protected, in‑app folder for storing saved Snaps and Stories moved from Memories, and they emphasize user...
’s Community Requests lets verified public safety agencies post time- and location-bound asks in the Neighbors app so nearby Ring owners can voluntarily review and submit recorded clips that might hel...
’s public policy says the company routinely retains, aggregates, or “” certain data instead of fully deleting every trace: examples called out include aggregated user statistics, usage and personaliza...
Clearing “Off‑Facebook Activity” severs the visible connection between third‑party event records and the user’s account in Meta’s interface, but it does not reliably erase the underlying identifiers t...
DuckDuckGo’s stated “no-tracking” approach means the company claims not to build or retain personally identifiable search histories, which in practice limits the sort of per-user search logs it can ha...
DuckDuckGo’s public posture on transparency is fundamentally different from Google’s: DuckDuckGo emphasizes a minimal-data architecture and privacy promises that, by design, leave little user-level da...