Your fact-checks will appear here
Research shows a wide range of vaginal dimensions, with no single 'most common' size, and variability is linked to age, parity, and body size.
Different measurement methods—MRI with vaginal distention, physical casting, and ultrasound (transvaginal, transperineal, or 3D/360° modes)—produce different reported vaginal dimension ranges because ...
Researchers measure vaginal depth and related dimensions with a mix of imaging (MRI, CT), ultrasound, physical castings and intra‑operative/dilator measurements; results are method‑dependent but repea...
Medical practitioners measure vaginal dimensions for specific clinical and engineering purposes: to plan and perform pelvic surgery, assess and treat pelvic floor disorders, guide obstetric management...