Your fact-checks will appear here
The application and implications of the War Powers Resolution in the context of the Trump administration's actions
Congress has several legal levers to block or terminate presidential military action without its authorization: the War Powers Resolution’s reporting and automatic-termination machinery, statutory joi...
A U.S. president is constrained from unilaterally seizing allied territory by a mix of constitutional allocation of war powers to Congress, statutory limits (notably the War Powers Resolution and appr...
The Speaker of the House has no unilateral command authority over the National Guard, but is part of a constitutional and statutory web that can receive notifications, request briefings, and influence...
The two episodes are legally and politically distinct: the 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden was framed by the Obama administration as a narrowly tailored counterterrorism operation undertaken und...
The Trump administration defined “drug vessels” broadly as maritime platforms it assessed to be “engaged in narco‑trafficking” or operated by “narco‑terrorists,” tying that label to designated cartels...
Congressional reform proposals aimed at clarifying or curtailing presidential war powers range from statutory updates to the War Powers Resolution to targeted bipartisan bills that would force preside...
Congress has statutory and constitutional tools to check an unauthorized presidential use of military force—most prominently the War Powers Resolution’s reporting rule and automatic 60‑day termination...
Congress can use funding riders and NDAA language to reshape presidential use of force by tying money to narrow, enforceable conditions, stricter reporting, and statutory sunsets—while recognizing lim...
The Biden administration has most commonly invoked the president’s Article II commander‑in‑chief powers, cited the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) as permissive/“ancilla...
The Constitution splits war powers: Congress alone may “declare war” and control appropriations, while the President is Commander in Chief; that split creates both clear limits and large gray areas ab...
The Supreme Court has shaped the contours of American war powers by endorsing broad federal authority in several landmark decisions while repeatedly deferring to the political branches on when and how...
The Speaker of the House cannot “overrule” the President on mobilizing or commanding the National Guard in ordinary circumstances: control of Guard forces generally rests with state governors (or the ...
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing U.S. armed forces into hostilities or situations where hostilities are imminent, and it places a stat...
The question “Biden military action unauthorized” cannot be answered with a simple yes or no: the Biden administration has repeatedly asserted legal authority to order strikes without a new congressio...
The Biden administration has layered new procedural constraints and transparency gestures onto established legal rationales for counterterrorism strikes, tightening presidential oversight for strikes ...
In 2024 Congress did not pass a new, operation-specific Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) to greenlight the year’s major U.S. military strikes; instead lawmakers largely acted through ann...
The Obama administration grounded both its use of force against Osama bin Laden and its timing of congressional notification in two intersecting legal strands: the 2001 Authorization for Use of Milita...
The Constitution splits the power to initiate and conduct war between Congress and the President: Congress has the formal power to “declare War” while the President is Commander in Chief with authorit...
The War Powers Resolution (WPR) was enacted to check unilateral presidential use of U.S. armed forces and requires the President to report uses of force and to terminate them after 60 days absent cong...
Yes and no: the Obama administration briefed and consulted Congress and sought—according to State Department reporting—an express authorization that it never ultimately received, but it also relied on...