Your fact-checks will appear here
World Health Organization investigations into the origin of COVID-19
No—there is no evidence in the material provided that the “confirmed” COVID‑19 was a deliberate “test of compliance”; WHO statements instead discuss the need for testing, surveillance, community engag...
Emergency Committee statements consistently warned that global surveillance, testing and sequencing had declined and urged countries to strengthen and integrate into routine systems, to maintain testi...
The available reporting does not provide a definitive list of "" that permit cancellation or postponement of elections for extreme weather, and therefore a claim naming exactly 12 states cannot be sub...
advisers urged a second, more intrusive phase of origins work that explicitly called for and research institutions in the area, paired with targeted and expanded sampling and serology — measures meant...
Variants such as reduce vaccine effectiveness primarily by accumulating mutations in the Spike protein that change antibody binding sites, producing antigenic mismatch to vaccine-elicited antibodies a...
Major origin probes have been dogged by documented conflict-of-interest concerns: high-profile scientists with ties to EcoHealth Alliance prompted the collapse or reshuffle of at least one internation...
The World Health Organization did not “start” COVID‑19; it is an international health agency that has led and convened investigations into the virus’s origins and declared the outbreak a public health...