Your fact-checks will appear here
YouTube's role in enabling or profiting from Onision's alleged conduct and its content moderation policies
enforces detailed, evolving rules that apply to —including a well-documented strike system and explicit content policies—while markets itself as a “free speech” venue with broader tolerance for politi...
There is insufficient reporting in the supplied sources to confirm whether is an existing or legitimate channel; the available documents instead offer general guidance on how to evaluate and protect c...
Prominent creators have repeatedly accused of , pointing to demonetizations, removals and permanent bans of high-profile channels as proof, and citing policy enforcement against and election-related c...
No reporting in the documents provided shows or issuing a public response to specific criticisms about their use of ; the available sources describe the ministry’s multimedia outreach and platforms bu...
’s demonetizations and channel removals from 2019–2025 flowed from tightened enforcement of the —especially around originality, reused content and advertiser-friendly standards—and from faster and com...
and (which operates YouTube Music) maintain policy frameworks that treat differently depending on format—paid political ads are subject to verification and placement rules, while user-generated politi...
Platforms such as now combine explicit disclosure rules, impersonation/privacy complaint channels, spam and deceptive-metadata enforcement, and emerging automated likeness-detection tools to identify ...
.com is the web portal and primary interface for YouTube, the video-sharing platform whose mission is “to give everyone a voice and show them the world” . Official documentation frames youtube.com as ...