What changes are payroll software vendors (ADP, Paychex, QuickBooks, UKG) planning to implement for 2026 W‑2 qualified overtime reporting?

Checked on January 22, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Payroll platforms are preparing to surface "qualified overtime" as a separately tracked and reportable item for tax year 2026, with QuickBooks detailing new payroll items and guidance now available and ADP notifying clients of reporting changes; however, vendor approaches and automation vary and public detail for Paychex and UKG is not present in the captured reporting [1] [2] [3] [4]. Employers should expect new W‑2/1099 reporting lines and supplemental reports in 2026 but must plan for manual setup, reconciliation issues, and uneven vendor tooling during a transition period [5] [6].

1. QuickBooks: explicit tracking items, manual setup, and W‑2 mapping

Intuit has published multiple support notes instructing customers to add a "Qualified OT Tracking" company contribution item and to manually calculate or import qualified overtime amounts because QuickBooks Desktop cannot fully auto-calculate qualified overtime when customers use custom pay types—Intuit’s guidance explicitly frames the tracking item as a bookkeeping tool mapped to payroll liability/expense accounts so it doesn’t alter taxes or pay processing [1] [7] [2] [8]. QuickBooks repeatedly notes the 2026 W‑2 will include dedicated reporting of the tracked qualified overtime (and users report seeing the item on paystubs and Company Summary columns), but customers are reporting setup and tracking failures that leave room for year‑end reconciliation work [2] [9] [10].

2. ADP: client advisories that W‑2/1099 reporting will change in 2026

ADP’s employer‑facing guidance flags that beginning with tax year 2026 employers must report qualified overtime and qualified tips on Forms W‑2 and Forms 1099, and it walks employers through withholding and year‑end planning implications including potential employee Form W‑4 adjustments [3]. ADP’s public FAQ framing treats the change as a reporting obligation that will require payroll teams to collect and transmit separate overtime/tip amounts starting in 2026, though the ADP piece in the record does not granularly describe the specific field or export changes ADP will deliver [3].

3. Paychex and UKG: absent public specifics in the captured reporting

No captured source in this set provides detailed, vendor‑specific plans from Paychex or UKG about how they will implement 2026 qualified overtime reporting; therefore, any claim about their product changes or rollout schedules cannot be supported here and must be treated as unknown in this recounting (limitation: no source provided for Paychex/UKG). Vendors often follow the IRS timeline, but without Paychex or UKG statements in the supplied reporting, employers should seek direct vendor notices or account‑team guidance for definitive implementation details [6].

4. What employers should expect operationally in 2026

Employers will need to segregate qualified overtime amounts on paystubs and W‑2/1099 information returns beginning with the 2026 reporting year, and many payroll systems—per Intuit and other tax advisors—are introducing tracking payroll items, new report templates, and reconciliation steps to populate the new W‑2/1099 fields [2] [6] [4]. Practically, that means businesses must review overtime policies (daily vs. weekly overtime, premium pay schemes), adopt vendor‑prescribed pay types when required, and prepare to export or manually adjust totals for year‑end if vendor automation is partial or buggy [2] [5] [9].

5. Conflicts, vendor incentives, and the data gap to watch

Intuit’s guidance reveals a tension: QuickBooks positions its new item as a non‑taxed company contribution for internal tracking even as regulators change W‑2 reporting — a design that preserves books but can confuse payroll tax flows and creates liabilities that must be mapped carefully [1] [2]. ADP’s messaging emphasizes compliance readiness but the public FAQ in this set stops short of technical field mappings, and the absence of Paychex/UKG disclosures in the captured reporting points to asymmetry in vendor transparency that could advantage larger clients with vendor account teams [3] [6]. All vendor announcements should be read with awareness that vendors aim to minimize support burden while steering clients toward paid advisory or higher‑tier services.

Conclusion: prepare for partial automation and active reconciliation

The documented vendor actions indicate a move to add tracking items, new reports, and W‑2/1099 reporting lines for qualified overtime in 2026—QuickBooks has published concrete setup steps and known limitations, ADP has notified clients at a high level, and Paychex/UKG details are not present in this reporting; the net result is a likely patchwork of automated and manual processes that will require employer oversight and close vendor coordination at year‑end [1] [2] [3] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
How will the IRS update Form W-2 layouts for qualified overtime and which box/Code will vendors use?
What specific QuickBooks Desktop setups cause qualified overtime to be mis‑tracked and how have users fixed them?
What Paychex and UKG official notices exist about 2026 qualified overtime reporting and where can employers find them?