Which faculty members or programs at Brown are most associated with radical or progressive activism?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Brown’s reputation for progressive and radical activism rests on a long institutional history of student protest and a constellation of faculty, programs and centers that study and sometimes ally with social movements; university archives and library exhibitions document decades of such engagement [1] [2]. Available reporting identifies specific faculty whose scholarship explicitly engages “radical structural and social change” (notably scholars listed on Brown’s Race & Social Movements page) and senior scholars and institutes publicly committed to progressive research and organizing, while noting that there is no single roster of “radical” faculty and that much activism at Brown is student-led [3] [4].
1. A campus built on protest — the archival record of activism
Brown’s University Archives and library exhibitions chronicle recurring waves of student-led protest from the 1960s through the 1990s and beyond — including occupations, divestment campaigns and the 1975 Black walkout — establishing an institutional memory that frames faculty–student alliances around social change [1] [2] [5]. This archival emphasis shows that the campus culture which students and some faculty draw on is long-standing, and that progressive demands have repeatedly shaped university policy debates [1].
2. Faculty named for scholarship on radical change and race
Brown’s Provost page for “Race & Social Movements” highlights faculty whose research explicitly addresses radical structural change, creative social reproduction and activism — for example, scholars described as specializing in “processes of radical structural and social change” and members of initiatives like the Native American and Indigenous Studies Initiative and the Center for the Study of Race and Ethnicity in America (names cited on Brown’s site include Carter, Hamlin, Paja Faudree among others) [3]. Those listings indicate which faculty pursue scholarship aligned with progressive movements, rather than proving every listed scholar is an on-the-ground activist; the university’s own pages frame these figures as intellectual anchors for race- and movement-focused work [3].
3. Centers, institutes and faculty networks that amplify progressive causes
Several Brown centers and faculty-led programs provide institutional vehicles for progressive ideas: the Cogut Institute for the Humanities and the Center for the Study of Race and Ethnicity in America are explicitly named as governance roles for faculty engaged in race-focused scholarship, and faculty such as Michael Kennedy have a history of collaboration with European progressive organizations and projects aimed at “progressive social change” [3] [6]. Recent campus debates over creating a Center for Philosophy, Politics and Economics and concerns about outside donors (notably the Koch-related controversy around the Political Theory Project) illustrate how faculty programs become focal points for wider political fights on campus [4].
4. Faculty–alumni coalitions and public-facing progressive organizing
Organized coalitions that include faculty as well as alumni and students — such as Stand Strong Brown, which describes itself as “alumni, parents, students, faculty and staff” mobilizing to defend the university against perceived authoritarian pressure — demonstrate how faculty sometimes participate in coordinated progressive advocacy beyond scholarship [7]. Stand Strong Brown publicly frames its agenda as protecting academic independence and resisting federal overreach, an explicitly political posture that signals faculty involvement in institution-level activism [7].
5. Student-driven activism, contested narratives, and reporting limits
Much of the day-to-day activism on College Hill is student-led — groups like Grasping at the Root, Students for Justice in Palestine, Brown/RISD Sunrise and BPAC are repeatedly cited as driving progressive campaigns, with faculty often supporting but not always fronting those efforts [4] [8]. Available reporting names specific faculty involved in movement-focused scholarship and university centers, but does not provide a comprehensive list of every faculty member who engages in activism; caution is warranted before accepting partisan or social-media-driven claims that label individual professors as “radical” without evidence [9]. The public record here supports identifying faculty and programs connected to progressive scholarship and institutional advocacy, while acknowledging that student groups remain the primary engine of campus protest [4] [1].