What were the performance statistics for the 1964 Pontiac gto

Checked on January 25, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The 1964 Pontiac GTO arrived as a factory performance package built around a 389-cubic-inch V‑8 that was officially rated at 325 horsepower with a single four‑barrel carburetor and 348 horsepower when equipped with the optional Tri‑Power three‑two‑barrel setup (the latter often cited as the headline figure) [1] [2]. Real‑world acceleration reports vary widely—from contemporary magazine runs that recorded startlingly quick times (later contested) to more conservative, stock‑car figures—so any single “performance stat” must be read alongside the specific engine, carburetion and transmission fitted [3] [4] [2].

1. Engine and published power figures

Pontiac’s 1964 GTO package centered on the 389‑ci V‑8 using Grand Prix heads, and Pontiac published 325 hp at 4,800 rpm for the single four‑barrel carb version and 348 hp at 4,900 rpm for the Tri‑Power setup with three Rochester two‑barrel carbs; the Tri‑Power was the high‑output option that helped define the car’s reputation [1] [2]. Car and Driver’s archival reporting reiterates the 348‑hp Tri‑Power spec and notes a 10.4:1 compression ratio for the high‑output engine in its test car, while Motor Trend’s contemporary writeup lists the same 325/348 split tied to carburetion differences [2] [1].

2. Acceleration and testing: conflicting real‑world numbers

Published 0–60 mph and quarter‑mile results are inconsistent because some press cars may have been specially prepared and engine options varied; MuscleCarFacts cites a typical stock 0–60 mph of about 7.5 seconds for standard equipment GTOs, while Car and Driver’s famous early tests—later scrutinized as possibly run in modified or different‑engine cars—reported sensational figures such as a 0–60 mph of 4.6 seconds and a quarter‑mile of 13.1 seconds at 115 mph [4] [3]. Modern retrospectives and road tests (including Curbside Classic’s review of vintage Car Life material) warn that factory “ringer” press cars can skew perceptions of a production car’s everyday performance, so the realistic stock range is better represented by the slower, conservative numbers [3] [4].

3. Drivetrain, gearing and equipment that shape performance

The GTO was sold as a performance package on the Tempest/LeMans platform with a standard three‑speed manual, optional four‑speed wide‑ratio and an automatic Super Turbine 300; gear‑ratio listings for GTO‑specific four‑speed transmissions are documented, and axle choices (including Pontiac’s optional 3.08 “lazy” ratio) strongly affected effective acceleration and fuel economy [5] [6]. Performance hardware included a dual exhaust, stiffer suspension, special wheels and tires, a seven‑blade fan with a cut‑off clutch, and an available Saf‑T‑Trak limited‑slip differential on test cars—items Motor Trend and Car and Driver noted as part of the complete package that made the GTO drive faster than a basic Tempest [1] [2].

4. Production context and how that influenced real outcomes

Pontiac sold more GTOs in 1964 than it initially forecast—roughly 32,450 units for the model year—which helped seed the marketplace with cars in different trims and option levels and therefore a wide spread of actual performance in used examples and magazine test cars [7] [8]. That sales success also explains why a handful of highly‑prepared press cars could create a mythos around extreme performance that wasn’t always matched by average production cars, a discrepancy highlighted by later investigators and historians [3] [8].

5. What remains uncertain in the sources

While horsepower, carburetion options, transmission choices and differing published acceleration runs are well documented in contemporary magazines and later histories, readily available sources in this packet do not provide a universally accepted torque figure, curb weight for every configuration, or a single definitive factory 0–60/quarter‑mile table that covers all options; therefore, readers should treat quoted acceleration times as conditional on engine, gearing and the provenance of the test car [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What were the factory torque and curb weight specifications for each 1964 Pontiac GTO engine option?
How did the Car and Driver and other contemporary press test protocols differ, and which 1964 GTO test runs were later disputed?
How did optional gear ratios and the Tri‑Power setup change real‑world fuel economy and drivability for 1964 GTO owners?