How are ACA premium tax credits calculated for 2025 and 2026?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
For 2025, the premium tax credit (PTC) calculation uses the enhanced rules in place through 2025: the PTC caps a household’s required contribution to the benchmark (second‑lowest‑cost silver) plan at a relatively low percentage of income (for example, the top cap cited for 2025 is about 9.02% in IRS guidance) and expands eligibility beyond 400% of the federal poverty level (FPL), with benchmark‑based subsidies holding many enrollees’ net premiums near $888 on average in 2024–25 [1] [2]. Unless Congress extends the enhanced rules, 2026 will revert to the original ACA formula: eligibility generally returns to 100–400% FPL, required contribution percentages will follow the ACA’s pre‑ARP schedule (higher than the enhanced caps), and subsidy size will be the difference between the benchmark premium and the household’s required contribution [3] [4].
1. How the credit is computed now: benchmark premium minus household contribution
The marketplace computes your PTC by first identifying the benchmark plan — the second‑lowest‑cost silver plan in your rating area — then subtracting the household’s expected contribution (the “applicable percentage” times household income) from that benchmark premium; the PTC equals the remainder and can be paid in advance to reduce monthly premiums [3] [5]. The applicable percentage is a sliding scale tied to income relative to the federal poverty level (FPL) and is the central lever that determines how large a credit you receive [3].
2. What “enhanced” rules changed through 2025
From 2021 through the 2025 plan year, Congress temporarily expanded eligibility and tightened the required‑contribution caps so people paid a smaller share of their income for the benchmark plan; those enhancements (from ARPA and extended by the IRA) also removed the 400% FPL cutoff for many enrollees, producing much larger subsidies and lower average net premiums [3] [2]. Analysts report the enhanced rules kept average subsidized premium payments roughly flat — about $888 annually in 2024–25 — and KFF explicitly models those enhanced caps when estimating 2026 impacts if Congress does not act [2].
3. Key numbers for 2025 you should know
IRS guidance and revenue procedures specify the applicable percentage caps used in the formula; the IRS cites 9.02% as a percentage referenced for 2025 in its Q&As and Revenue Procedure note [1]. The Congressional and budget analyses show the enhanced rules extended subsidy eligibility above 400% FPL and reduced required contributions compared with pre‑ARP law [4] [3].
4. What changes for 2026 if enhancements expire
If enhancements lapse, PTC rules revert to the ACA’s original structure for 2026: the income eligibility regimen generally returns to roughly 100–400% of FPL (with Medicaid interactions affecting the low end), required contribution percentages are higher under the statutory schedule, and higher benchmark premiums projected for 2026 will be compared against those pre‑ARP percentages — producing materially smaller credits and much larger net premiums for many enrollees [3] [6]. Multiple analyses warn that persons above 400% FPL who got subsidies in 2025 would lose eligibility in 2026 if Congress doesn’t renew the enhancements [7] [8].
5. Who is most exposed to the change
Households with incomes above four times the FPL — cited as roughly $62,600 for an individual or $128,600 for a family of four for 2026 coverage in one analysis — are the likeliest to lose all subsidies when the enhanced rules sunset; older enrollees, early retirees and self‑employed people are overrepresented among those groups and face the biggest dollar hits [7] [8]. KFF and CBO/CRS modeling show substantial average premium increases if enhancements lapse, and insurers already filed higher gross premiums for 2026, compounding the effect [2] [9].
6. Practical implications and uncertainty
Marketplace calculations rely on MAGI, prior‑year FPL guidelines (the marketplace uses the HHS poverty guidelines published during open enrollment to determine next‑year subsidies), and local benchmark premiums, so individuals’ credits are highly sensitive to family size, exact income, and ZIP code — and to whether Congress acts in late 2025 to extend enhancements [5] [10]. Analysts and consumer groups emphasize that open enrollment messaging and calculators (KFF, HealthCare.gov tools) are the only practical way for households to estimate 2026 changes, and several sources note that many calculators and guidance were updated to reflect 2026 premiums and IRS caps as they became available [10] [2] [11].
Limitations and competing views: sources agree on the formula mechanics (benchmark minus required contribution) and on the temporary nature of the enhanced rules [3] [9]. Where they diverge is emphasis: KFF and consumer groups stress the large immediate premium shock if enhancements expire and model concrete average impacts [2], while technical CRS/CBO writeups outline the statutory reversion and mechanics without forecasting behavioral responses such as plan‑selection changes or Medicaid shifts [12] [4]. Available sources do not mention specific 2026 numeric applicable‑percentage tables beyond the general statement that the percentages “revert back” to the ACA adjustment process (not found in current reporting).