How much did federal borrowing against Social Security trust funds change under different presidents?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Federal borrowing “against” the Social Security trust funds means the Treasury issues special-issue securities to the OASI/DI trusts and records intragovernmental debt; that practice has been constant since the trust funds’ creation in 1939 and through accounting changes in 1968 and 1990 [1] [2]. Amounts cited as “borrowed” vary by date and measurement—commonly quoted totals include roughly $1.7 trillion (Bush-era White House claim) and about $2.9 trillion (media summaries of accumulated trust fund holdings)—but those figures reflect the trust funds’ holdings of Treasury securities, not cash removed from a separate vault, and are best understood as intragovernmental debt that must be honored when bonds are redeemed [3] [4] [5].
1. What “borrowing from Social Security” actually means and why it changed the conversation
The trust funds are legally required to invest surpluses in Treasury securities, so when payroll taxes exceed benefits the Treasury issues special-issue bonds to the trust funds and uses the cash for other government spending—an act the Congressional Research Service and SSA describe explicitly as federal government borrowing from the trust funds and as counting against the statutory federal debt limit [5] [1]. The presentation of those transactions in the federal budget shifted in 1968 (a Johnson Commission reform) and again in 1990, which changed whether the trust funds were shown on the unified budget and thereby altered public perceptions of “borrowing,” though the financing mechanics remained the same [1] [2].
2. Presidents and the headline numbers: why different administrations get blamed or credited
Public figures about how much the government “borrowed” from Social Security usually track the cumulative face value of the trust funds’ Treasury securities; different sources pick different end dates and thus produce different totals—for example, the George W. Bush White House cited a $1.7 trillion figure in its policy material [3], while later summaries have cited roughly $2.9 trillion in accumulated trust fund securities as a way of saying those assets exist as Treasury obligations [4]. Independent assessments emphasize that since 1983 every president has had the Treasury hold Social Security surpluses as special-issue securities—so the increase in intragovernmental debt is a function of multi-decade surpluses and deficits, congressional budgets, and macroeconomic conditions rather than a single president’s one-off action [6] [7].
3. The accounting reality and political narratives
Analysts from the CBO and academic observers stress that interest credited to the trust funds is intragovernmental and produces no net effect on the unified deficit, even as it shifts composition between “debt held by the public” and intragovernmental debt [8]. Advocacy groups and campaign teams have used headline totals for political leverage—some emphasizing that the government “borrowed” large sums to argue that Social Security has been weakened, others highlighting that trust funds earn interest and have legal claims on Treasury to argue that no funds were “stolen” [4] [9]. The Concord Coalition recounts policy proposals and debates—such as George H.W. Bush’s 1990 proposal to dedicate surpluses to debt reduction—showing how presidents’ narratives can shape proposed fixes even while the underlying mechanics remain consistent [9].
4. What can’t be answered cleanly from the available reporting
A precise per‑president year‑by‑year change in the face value of Treasury securities held by the Social Security trust funds requires detailed Treasury trust‑fund transaction tables and selected cut‑off dates not supplied in these sources; the reporting here documents the mechanism, notable summary totals cited by administrations and media, and the legal/accounting framing but does not produce a comprehensive presidential accounting ledger [1] [6] [4].
5. Bottom line for readers parsing claims
“How much was borrowed under President X” is a question of measurement and timeframe: the trust funds’ holdings of Treasury securities rose and fell with annual surpluses and redemptions across administrations, producing cumulative intragovernmental debt figures that are frequently quoted (e.g., $1.7 trillion, $2.9 trillion) but must be read as claims on the Treasury backed by law rather than fungible cash taken out of a separate pot [3] [4] [5]. For a definitive president-by-president table one must consult Treasury and SSA trust‑fund transaction data for explicit start‑and‑end dates.