Which IRMAA brackets (and percentage surcharges) did the SSA publish for 2026 and how did they change from 2025?
Executive summary
The Social Security Administration (via CMS/SSA notices reported across Medicare coverage guidance) set five IRMAA income brackets for 2026 with the first threshold at $109,000 (single) / $218,000 (married filing jointly) and the top indexed tiers capped at $500,000 (individual) and $750,000 (joint) — the same structural five‑band system adopted since 2018 with the top band frozen until 2028 [1] [2] [3]. Surcharges for 2026 rose noticeably: Part B IRMAA surcharges increased substantially from 2025 (reported ≈+9–10%), yielding Part B surcharge amounts that push total monthly Part B bills into a roughly $284–$690 range depending on bracket, while Part D IRMAA surcharges rose more modestly (reported ≈+6%), ranging about $14.50–$91 monthly [4] [2] [3].
1. What the 2026 brackets look like and where the money thresholds sit
For 2026 the SSA/CMS framework uses five income bands (the same bands apply to both Part B and Part D), with the entry point for surcharge treatment at $109,000 for single filers and $218,000 for married filing jointly — the first threshold rising from $106,000 in 2025 to $109,000 in 2026 as reported by CMS‑tracking outlets [1] [2]. Industry writeups and technical summaries also note the statutory rule that the fifth/top bracket (the very high income tier) is not indexed until 2028, leaving that cap at $500,000 individual / $750,000 joint for now [3] [2].
2. How much the surcharges add to premiums in 2026 (Parts B and D)
The standard Part B base premium for 2026 is reported as $202.90, and when IRMAA applies the Part B surcharges add between roughly $81.20 and $487.00 monthly depending on bracket — producing total Part B monthly payments reported in the $284.10 to $689.90 band for the highest payers [5] [3] [2]. Part D IRMAA surcharges for 2026 are reported to range approximately $14.50 to $91.00 per month, billed directly for prescription coverage and added on top of plan premiums [2] [3].
3. How 2026 changed from 2025: thresholds and percentage shifts
Multiple reporting strands describe two distinct movements: income thresholds edged upward (driven by the CPI‑U indexing rule and mandatory rounding), and surcharge dollar amounts were increased at different rates for B and D. The first IRMAA threshold rose from $106,000 to $109,000 (about +2.8% by one calculation reflecting rounding) while several analysts attribute most of the bracket increases to a smaller CPI‑U rise near +1.02% for the earlier brackets — the discrepancy reflects statutory rounding and reporting methods [1] [6]. Surcharge percentages reported vary by source: IRMAA‑B surcharges grew by roughly 9–9.7% versus 2025 and IRMAA‑D surcharges grew about 6.0% in 2026 per IRMAA‑focused firms [4] [2].
4. Why these changes matter and the mixed narratives in reporting
The practical effect is acute because IRMAA is a cliff formula: crossing a threshold by even a dollar triggers the full higher surcharge for Parts B and D, so modest income swings or one‑time distributions can move beneficiaries into materially higher monthly bills (a planning point emphasized by pension and benefits advisers) [6]. Coverage‑trackers stress that thresholds are indexed annually (except the frozen top band), and that CMS/SSA final notices underlie these numbers — yet some outlets emphasize the larger headline dollar increases in Part B premiums while others focus on threshold movement and planning tactics, producing slightly different percent‑change framings in the coverage [7] [6] [4].
5. Limits of the reporting and what remains to verify
The sources synthesize CMS/SSA final notices and practitioner calculations but no single public SSA PDF listing every 2026 bracket/surcharge line‑by‑line was among the provided files; therefore the exact per‑bracket dollar surcharges in every band are drawn from consistent secondary reporting (Kiplinger, IRMAA advisory sites, technical tax reviews) rather than a single SSA table in the document set provided here [2] [3] [7]. Where sources diverge on the precise percent change for thresholds (1.02% CPI‑U versus 2.83% after rounding) those differences are explicitly noted above and reflect the statutory rounding rules and different calculation methods [6] [1].