What is the evidence for liver toxicity or hepatotoxicity from long-term bacopa monnieri use?
Executive summary
Major toxicology resources and animal studies find no convincing evidence that Bacopa monnieri causes liver injury: LiverTox assigns Bacopa a likelihood score "E" (unlikely cause of clinically apparent liver injury) and states there are no reports linking Bacopa to clinically apparent acute liver injury [1]. Multiple chronic and acute toxicology studies in rodents report no histological liver damage at a wide range of doses and describe hepatoprotective or antioxidant effects in liver‑injury models [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What mainstream clinical-review sources conclude: formal safety assessment
The NIH LiverTox entry on Bacopa (updated April 24, 2024) concludes there is no evidence that Bacopa monnieri causes liver injury and gives it a likelihood score E — “unlikely cause of clinically apparent liver injury” — after reviewing available clinical reports [1]. LiverTox is a standard reference clinicians use for drug‑induced liver injury, and its statement is the most direct clinical‑facing assessment in the available sources [1].
2. Animal toxicology: chronic dosing versus safety signals
Multiple controlled toxicology studies in rodents found no liver toxicity with chronic Bacopa exposure. An extended 270‑day study in Sprague‑Dawley rats reported no histopathological liver changes at doses up to 1,500 mg/kg and no serious adverse effects after single high doses (5,000 mg/kg) [4] [2]. A 2025 review of preclinical and clinical evidence similarly states rats treated with Bacopa showed no significant histological changes in liver tissue across tested dose ranges [3].
3. Evidence of hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity
Preclinical experiments repeatedly show Bacopa extracts reduce liver injury in toxic models: studies report protection against nitrobenzene‑ or paracetamol‑induced damage, mitigation of morphine/heroin‑related hepatotoxicity, and antioxidant effects that preserve liver enzymes or histology in animal models [6] [7] [8] [5]. A 2025 PLOS One study even frames Bacopa extracts as having potential therapeutic effects against hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and computational models [9]. These findings argue Bacopa more often shows protective biochemical effects in lab models than clear toxicity.
4. Case reports and polyherbal formulations: where caution arises
Reports of herb‑associated severe liver injury in clinical series often implicate polyherbal Ayurvedic products rather than single‑ingredient Bacopa supplements. Reviews of Ayurvedic herb‑linked hepatotoxicity note cases tied to multi‑ingredient formulations and raise concerns about adulteration, contamination, or herb–herb interactions as plausible mechanisms [10] [11]. One structured causality assessment found a lower-probability association (+6 points on CIOMS) for “Brahmi” products that in some reports contained Bacopa monnieri, but these were polyherbal and the causality was weaker than for other herbs [11]. The sources emphasize poor manufacturing, contamination or mislabeling as frequent confounders [10].
5. Human clinical data and adverse‑event signal absence
Available clinical summaries and product‑safety reviews (including LiverTox) report no clear human signal of Bacopa‑induced liver enzyme elevations or clinically apparent acute liver injury [1]. Consumer and supplement‑oriented summaries repeat safety profiles and advise drug‑interaction checks, but do not document bona fide hepatotoxicity cases attributable to isolated Bacopa [12] [13]. Available sources do not mention randomized long‑term human trials showing hepatotoxicity.
6. Mechanistic and interaction concerns clinicians note
Although direct hepatotoxicity is not reported, multiple sources warn Bacopa’s constituents (bacosides and saponins) can interact pharmacokinetically with other drugs and may alter drug levels [13] [14]. Reviews of Ayurvedic herb hepatotoxicity stress that metabolites, unknown interactions, adulterants, or contamination — not the named herb per se — often explain clinical liver injury associated with traditional formulations [10].
7. Takeaway for patients and clinicians
The preponderance of evidence in formal reviews and animal studies supports that Bacopa monnieri is unlikely to cause clinically apparent liver injury when used as a single, properly manufactured supplement [1] [2] [3]. However, clinicians should remain alert to hepatotoxicity reports arising from polyherbal products, contaminated or adulterated preparations, and possible drug interactions that could secondarily affect liver risk [10] [11] [14]. Available sources do not mention long‑term randomized human trials demonstrating hepatotoxicity attributable to Bacopa monnieri.
Limitations and unresolved questions: the literature relies heavily on preclinical work and case series of polyherbal products; true population‑level, long‑term human safety data remain limited in the cited sources [1] [2].