What major clinical trials have tested cinnamon, berberine or fenugreek for type 2 diabetes and what were their results?

Checked on January 31, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have tested berberine-vs-metformin">berberine, cinnamon, and fenugreek in people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes; overall the literature shows signals of modest glycemic and some lipid benefit for berberine and for cinnamon in some studies, while fenugreek has smaller, inconsistent trials suggesting possible reductions in fasting glucose or post‑prandial glucose but limited effects on HbA1c . Trial quality is mixed—systematic appraisals report low-to-moderate methodological rigor across studies, and many positive results come from small, heterogeneous trials or combined-supplement studies that complicate attribution [1].

1. Berberine: multiple RCTs showing consistent glucose-lowering signals

Berberine has the strongest and most consistent clinical trial footprint of the three: randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled trials of roughly three months have reported statistically significant reductions in fasting blood glucose and HbA1c compared with placebo, and several trials also observed improvements in lipids, body weight and insulin resistance markers . A pilot double‑blind randomized trial of a berberine product in prediabetes found reductions in fasting and postprandial glucose and HOMA‑IR (insulin resistance) versus placebo, and other 3‑month RCTs in people with diabetes likewise reported lower HbA1c and fasting glucose on berberine . More recent randomized trials that combined berberine with other agents (for example berberine plus cinnamon) also showed glucose and LDL‑C reductions over 12 weeks, but combination designs limit conclusions about berberine alone .

2. Cinnamon: many small RCTs and mixed meta-analytic conclusions

Cinnamon has been tested in numerous small randomized controlled trials with inconsistent outcomes: some trials report improvements in fasting glucose, HbA1c and lipids, while updated systematic reviews and dose‑response meta‑analyses conclude the overall effect on glycemic control is inconclusive because of heterogeneity in dose, cinnamon type, study size and quality . A registered randomized trial reported benefits on anthropometric, glycemic and lipid parameters especially in participants with higher baseline BMI, but higher‑quality pooled analyses still describe conflicting evidence and call for larger, standardized RCTs to resolve whether modest benefits are reproducible and clinically meaningful .

3. Fenugreek: historical small trials, some positive signals but limited high‑quality data

Fenugreek seed has an older literature of small clinical trials suggesting reductions in fasting glucose and post‑prandial glucose; examples include Iranian and Jordanian studies reporting lower fasting glucose and improved 2‑hour postprandial glucose with gram‑level seed dosing, but effects on HbA1c have been inconsistent and many trials were small or uncontrolled . More recent randomized trials have tested fenugreek together with berberine and found that the combination improved glycemic indices and inflammatory or lipid markers over 12 weeks in a 50‑patient double‑blind RCT, but because fenugreek was co‑administered with berberine the independent effect of fenugreek remains uncertain .

4. Study quality, patterns, and limitations that matter for interpretation

A systematic assessment of the clinical trial literature covering berberine, cinnamon and fenugreek found average Jadad scores near 3 (with fenugreek lower), and reported that only about 63% of trials scored ≥3 on Jadad, with gaps in reporting of randomization and blinding—features that undermine confidence in effect estimates [1]. Meta-analyses for cinnamon explicitly call the evidence inconclusive due to small, heterogeneous trials and variable dosing and formulations . Many positive trials are short (typically 8–12 weeks), sample sizes are small, and several contemporary RCTs use combinations (berberine+cinnamon, berberine+fenugreek) or proprietary extracts, making it difficult to generalize single-agent efficacy or safety .

5. Bottom line: modest promise, not a substitute for standard care—research gaps remain

Collectively, berberine has the clearest randomized‑trial signal for modest reductions in fasting glucose and HbA1c and some lipid benefits over 8–12 weeks, cinnamon shows mixed but sometimes positive findings that meta‑analysts judge inconclusive, and fenugreek produces scattered small‑trial signals for fasting or post‑prandial glucose but inconsistent HbA1c effects and limited high‑quality evidence; across all three, heterogeneity, small sample sizes, short follow‑up and frequent use of combination products mean evidence is suggestive but not definitive for replacing or supplanting established diabetes therapies [1]. Where claims extend beyond these trial settings—for long‑term outcomes, standardized dosing, or monotherapy equivalence—existing sources do not provide robust support and further large, rigorously conducted RCTs are needed [1].

Want to dive deeper?
What large randomized controlled trials are registered or ongoing testing berberine monotherapy for type 2 diabetes?
How do cinnamon species and extract standardization (cassia vs. Ceylon) affect clinical trial outcomes for glycemic control?
What are the known drug interactions and safety signals for berberine, cinnamon, and fenugreek in people on common diabetes medications?