Film McGraw talks about recipe to cure diabetes 2
Executive summary
The claim that a single “recipe” can cure Type 2 diabetes is not supported by mainstream medical authorities, even as some films and books document dramatic improvements from intensive diet changes; the documentary Simply Raw: Reversing Diabetes in 30 Days follows participants who switch to a raw vegan diet and report getting off insulin [1] [2], while the American Diabetes Association states diabetes is a chronic disease with no known cure [3].
1. What the film actually shows: raw-diet patients and dramatic anecdotes
Simply Raw: Reversing Diabetes in 30 Days is an independent documentary that chronicles six Americans with diabetes who adopt a vegan, organic, uncooked-food regimen and portrays medical, physical, and emotional transformations — including participants stopping insulin — over the film’s 30-day experiment [1] [2] [4].
2. The scientific and institutional counterweight: “no cure” vs. remission
Major diabetes authorities frame Type 2 diabetes as a chronic condition and explicitly state there is no cure, a position highlighted in fact-checking of the film and quoted from the American Diabetes Association [3]; at the same time, peer-reviewed commentary acknowledges that some intense dietary approaches can put Type 2 diabetes into remission for some patients, making the language of “reverse” or “pause” contentious but not impossible [5].
3. Nutrient claims and contested nutrition science inside the film
The film advances a strong nutritional thesis — for example, a claim that cooking destroys large percentages of protein, vitamins, minerals and phytonutrients — a dramatic framing used to justify raw-food superiority that appears in the movie’s narration [6]; such sweeping nutrient-loss statistics are presented as fact in the film but are part of a broader, debated debate in nutrition science rather than settled medical consensus [6].
4. Evidence versus anecdote: why documentaries can mislead
Documentary storytelling centers powerful personal narratives, and Simply Raw leverages those anecdotes to argue diet led to remission and discontinuation of medication [1] [2]; fact-checkers and critics point out that selective editing, truncated context and extrapolating from small, uncontrolled samples can create misleading impressions about generalizability [3].
5. Alternative dietary approaches and the scientific nuance
Other contemporary work — notably books and programs advocating very-low-carbohydrate diets, intermittent fasting or structured meal plans — also claim remission is achievable and are discussed in scientific reviews as promising in some studies while contesting wholesale rejection of current evidence-based treatments [5]; this underscores that diet can be powerful, but the mechanism, best protocols and long-term sustainability remain debated in the literature [5].
6. Harms, scams and commercial incentives to watch for
Parallel to legitimate diet-based interventions, a proliferation of “secret recipe” miracle cures and supplements promise overnight reversal of Type 2 diabetes; consumer-protection reporting and scam analyses warn there is no miracle drop or hidden recipe that reliably reverses diabetes and highlight manipulative marketing tactics around such claims [7].
7. Where reporting leaves gaps and the practical takeaway
Available sources document the film’s claims and the strong counter-position from diabetes authorities but do not settle individual medical questions about who might safely reduce medications; the reporting shows real improvements in film subjects [1] [2] and simultaneous institutional caution that diabetes is incurable [3], leaving one clear conclusion from the assembled evidence: diet changes can produce remission-like results in some Type 2 patients, but “a recipe to cure” as a universal, science-backed promise is not supported by mainstream clinical guidance [1] [3] [5] [7].