How do hormone replacement therapy and androgen therapy affect sexual desire in postmenopausal women?
Executive summary
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) that includes estrogens modestly improves aspects of sexual function after menopause—particularly lubrication, pain, and overall satisfaction—yet for most women it produces only small gains in desire itself (libido) [1] [2] [3]. Androgen (testosterone) therapy has clearer signals for increasing sexual motivation and desire in some postmenopausal women, especially when given with estrogen or to those with surgical menopause, but the effect size, optimal regimen, safety profile, and universal applicability remain contested in the literature [4] [5] [6].
1. Estrogen’s benefits: improving bodies more than desire
Randomized trials and meta-analyses find that estrogen-based HRT probably slightly improves composite sexual-function scores—largely by reducing genitourinary symptoms (vaginal dryness, dyspareunia) and by improving lubrication and pain during sex—mechanisms that can indirectly help sexual activity and satisfaction, but not reliably restore libido for most women [1] [2] [3]. When decreased desire is secondary to physical barriers created by the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), estrogen is the recommended first-line therapy because it targets those local causes of discomfort and can thereby enable sexual activity [1].
2. Androgens: a targeted boost for motivation in some women
A sizeable body of clinical work, including randomized trials and reviews, supports the idea that androgens play a role in sexual motivation and that testosterone supplementation can enhance desire and frequency of sexual activity in subsets of postmenopausal women—most convincingly when testosterone is added to estrogen or used in transdermal forms—although pure androgen-alone treatments have produced mixed or minimal effects in many controlled studies [4] [7] [8] [6]. Some trials show meaningful improvements in HSDD (hypoactive sexual desire disorder), but others (including large randomized studies of androgen-only patches) report only modest gains, and systematic reviews caution that androgen-only approaches are unlikely to be broadly effective [9] [5] [10].
3. Who benefits most: the clinical signals
The strongest signals for benefit come from women who were surgically menopausal (loss of ovarian androgen production), those who originally improved on estrogen but then relapsed in desire, and women with objectively low androgen levels or a clinical picture consistent with androgen deficiency; several trials show combined estrogen–androgen regimens outperform estrogen alone in dissatisfied women [4] [11] [10]. Conversely, in unselected populations of postmenopausal women, estrogen alone usually produces only small sexual-function gains, and physiological doses of testosterone do not consistently raise desire [2] [6].
4. Safety, regulation and the limits of the evidence
Clinical use of androgen therapy in women has often proceeded off-label, with heterogeneous preparations and doses, limited long-term safety data, and no broad FDA-approved testosterone product for women—prompting calls for shared decision-making, monitoring, and caution about side effects such as hirsutism, lipid changes, and unknown cardiovascular or breast risks with longer exposure [6] [12] [7]. Systematic reviews note the overall evidence base is heterogenous: some trials are small, industry interests have driven drug development, and meta-analyses only show modest average effects, meaning real-world benefit depends on careful patient selection and follow-up [5] [13].
5. Interpreting the debate: science, marketing and clinical practice
Scientific reviews underline two competing interpretations: one school holds estradiol is the central modulator of female sexual desire and that androgens add little except in special cases; another argues androgens have an important, clinically useful role for libido and broader well-being in androgen-deficient women [6] [8]. Hidden agendas matter—pharmaceutical investment in androgen products has fueled enthusiasm despite mixed population-level evidence [5] [13]—so clinicians must weigh modest average benefits, individual symptom patterns (GSM vs primary low desire), safety uncertainties, and patient priorities when considering estrogen, androgen, or combined therapy [1] [7].