What legislative or executive actions formally changed draft deferment policy during the Vietnam War?

Checked on January 19, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Formal changes to draft deferment policy during the Vietnam era came from a mix of congressional amendments to the Selective Service laws and administrative directives by the Selective Service System and presidents—most notably the Military Selective Service Act amendments in 1967, Selective Service administrative tightening in the mid-1960s, the reintroduction of a draft lottery in 1969, and executive actions under President Nixon that curtailed paternity deferments and moved the nation toward ending draft calls and creating an all‑volunteer force [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

1. The 1967 legislative turning point: Military Selective Service Act amendments

Congress amended the Selective Service framework in 1967, and those amendments are widely credited with removing or narrowing many graduate‑school deferments while preserving I‑S status for high school students and II‑S for undergraduates under age 24—changes that formally tightened who could claim education as a long‑term escape from induction [1] [6].

2. Administrative tightening and academic screening (mid‑1960s Selective Service actions)

Even before the 1967 law, the Selective Service System used administrative policies to constrict student deferments: Director Lewis Hershey instituted academic evaluation rules in 1965 that empowered local draft boards to defer students based on intellectual ability and satisfactory academic progress rather than automatic blanket deferments, shifting the practical criteria for II‑S status [2].

3. The 1969 draft lottery: a formal change in induction order, not an instant removal of deferments

The 1969 reintroduction of a numbered draft lottery formally changed which birthdates were called first and aimed to equalize risk, but it did not immediately eliminate college deferments—student deferments remained in place when the December 1, 1969 lottery was held, a fact that helped fuel protests because many activists saw the lottery as insufficiently redistributive while leaving class‑skewing deferments intact [3].

4. Nixon’s executive and policy moves: curtailing paternity deferments and ending draft calls

President Richard Nixon used executive policy and administration of the Selective Service to further alter deferment practice: in 1970 he ended automatic paternity (III‑A) deferments—requiring men with children to prove financial hardship rather than receiving blanket protection—and later pursued reforms to increase transparency, equalize induction risk, and limit deferment durations; Nixon also halted draft calls in 1972 and presided over the transition toward an all‑volunteer force formally adopted in 1973 [4] [7] [5].

5. Congressional and administrative follow‑through: limiting deferment duration and structural reform after 1970

Congressional and Selective Service reforms after the peak years created structural limits—by the early 1970s deferments were being limited in duration (for example, to the end of a semester under later rules) and the system was reshaped to reduce long‑term student protection and make the lottery and priority system more binding, reflecting both legislative amendments and administrative rulemaking to implement the shift away from open-ended educational deferments [8] [9].

6. Politics, equity and the limits of formal change

Legislative and executive changes were both policy responses and politically consequential choices: reformers cited fairness and the recommendations of advisory commissions in 1967, while critics and many historians argue that deferment rules—until more sweeping post‑1970 reforms—continued to advantage wealthier students and allowed class‑based avoidance [1] [10]; scholars also note Nixon’s motive to undercut antiwar mobilization by reducing draft exposure among college‑age men, a political subtext to formal administrative and legislative actions [7] [9].

7. What the sources do and do not establish

Primary reporting and scholarship here establish the key legal and administrative milestones—the 1967 Selective Service amendments, Hershey’s mid‑1960s academic screening, the 1969 lottery, Nixon’s 1970 limitation on paternity deferments, and the end of draft calls in 1972 leading to abolition of conscription in favor of an all‑volunteer force in 1973—but the sources used do not provide the full congressional statute text or the detailed Federal Register rulemaking history for every administrative tweak, so precise statutory language and the step‑by‑step regulatory timeline would require consulting the 1967 statute and Selective Service rule archives directly [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What exactly did the 1967 Military Selective Service Act amendments say about graduate student deferments?
How did local draft boards implement Lewis Hershey’s 1965 academic evaluation policy in practice?
What evidence links Nixon’s draft reforms to his political strategy toward the antiwar movement?