Which lawsuits filed in 2025 by U.S. citizens against ICE or CBP resulted in settlements or court rulings?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
In 2025, at least one major lawsuit brought against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by U.S.-based plaintiffs resulted in a nationwide settlement: Gonzalez v. ICE, a class-action that imposed new limits on ICE detainer practices [1]. Other high-profile actions referenced in the reporting — including an ACLU‑supported claim about alleged deportations of U.S. citizens that was dropped and several citizen or advocacy‑led suits targeting ICE/CBP conduct — either were dismissed, remain in early stages, or had no public settlement or dispositive ruling reported in the provided material [2] [3] [4].
1. Gonzalez v. ICE — a settlement that reworked detainers and produced concrete relief
Gonzalez v. ICE ended in a settlement requiring ICE to change long‑standing detainer practices by limiting the use of detainers and converting many requests into less coercive “Requests for Notification of Release,” a change scheduled to take effect nationwide beginning March 4, 2025 [1]. The settlement, brought by civil‑rights groups including the ACLU of Southern California, NDLON, NIJC and private counsel, addresses what plaintiffs described as a systemic lack of neutral probable‑cause review when local jails hold people beyond their release dates at ICE’s request [1]. The agreement was framed as structural relief affecting most of the United States and was reported by the National Immigrant Justice Center as a class action settlement, not an individual payout [1].
2. ACLU‑supported claim about deported U.S. citizens — dropped, according to DHS
The Department of Homeland Security publicly stated that an ACLU‑supported lawsuit alleging ICE deported U.S. citizens was “baseless” and that the suit has been dropped; DHS’s account includes details about one incident in which a woman presented a valid U.S. passport after choosing to travel to Honduras with her U.S.-citizen child [2]. The DHS press account frames the case as dismissed without a settlement and characterizes the underlying suit as “baseless lawfare,” language that signals an explicit institutional rebuttal to the plaintiffs’ claims [2]. The available item is DHS’s announcement; the reporting here does not include contemporaneous filings from the ACLU or a court docket to contrast DHS’s framing [2].
3. Citizen‑initiated and advocacy lawsuits in 2025 that had not yielded settlements or final rulings in the public record provided
Several other matters involving U.S. citizens or domestic organizations suing ICE/CBP were reported in 2025, but the documents in this packet do not show final settlements or dispositive rulings. MALDEF signaled steps toward a civil‑rights lawsuit on behalf of a U.S. citizen detained by ICE, alleging constitutional violations including Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims; the item describes a claim and FTCA notice, not a resolved case or settlement [3]. Separate litigation pushed by advocacy groups sought to bar ICE arrests at immigration courts and challenged enforcement conduct in court; reporting described filings and motions for relief but did not report final judgments or settlements in the excerpts provided [4]. FOIA and records lawsuits seeking information about ICE detention expansion or court arrests were also filed later in 2025, again with activity reported but without identified settlements or final rulings in these excerpts [5] [6].
4. Bigger picture: litigation volume and legal pathways — context and limits of the public record
Broader trackers and legal commentary referenced dozens to hundreds of immigration‑related cases and rulings in 2025, and documented trends — for example, many judges ruling against certain administration policies — but those trackers aggregate large categories of litigation and do not identify every individual citizen‑filed suit against ICE/CBP that settled in 2025 [7] [8]. Legal experts and organizations also flagged doctrinal obstacles and potential new legislative fixes for suing federal immigration officers (FTCA, Bivens, and proposed NOEM Act reforms), signaling that many citizen claims face procedural hurdles even when facts support constitutional claims [9] [10] [11]. The sources supplied here do not contain a comprehensive docket‑level list of every 2025 citizen suit against ICE/CBP that reached settlement or a final court ruling; therefore, the analysis identifies Gonzalez v. ICE as a confirmed settlement from the materials and treats other matters as reported filings or actions without confirmed resolutions in the provided reporting [1] [2] [3] [4].
5. What remains unclear and where to look next
The materials establish Gonzalez v. ICE as a settlement imposing operational reforms and record DHS’s statement that an ACLU‑backed deportation claim was dropped, but they leave open whether other citizen suits filed in 2025 concluded with confidential settlements or rulings not summarized here; detailed answers would require checking federal court dockets, FOIA results, and press releases from plaintiffs’ counsel or ICE for each named case [1] [2]. Given the volume of immigration litigation tracked in 2025, a full accounting of all citizen‑filed lawsuits that resolved by settlement or final ruling requires targeted docket searches beyond the set of sources provided [7] [8].